this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
194 points (98.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6980 readers
413 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MTK@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

I can't wait for a study in 3 years labled "We are doomed"

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sooooo build a bunker and hoard guns and ammo, then?

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago

What do you plan to do with a hoard of guns and ammo? Get yourself killed so people can loot your bunker?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Too optimistic. We are already 15 years past the "3 more years" of the past.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 27 points 22 hours ago

Americans voted for Trump, so we all get to die. Yay.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Well then brace for impact I guess, because we know we aren't going to change how we do things much in the next 5 years.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Wrong. There's always going to be a worse impact. There's no upper bound to how bad things can get.

[–] kapulsa@feddit.org 8 points 13 hours ago

For humanity, there is. The impact we're facing right now is the end of civilization before the end of the century. The impact we're facing if we don't act within 3 years is extinction. The speed of these impacts may vary slightly, though.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

By Tuesday...

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You would think even the most selfish politicians and CEOs have already experienced some extreme events at this point.

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They will be safe in their air conditioned, walled, armed guarded, coal powered compounds. The rest of us are expendable to them.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No one is safe. All will suffer on a dying planet.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

The Global South will be the ones to take on the brunt of the suffering, as is tradition.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

More than you or I will get 🤷

[–] SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well considering they have so much wealth, they can just build their Shangri la on top of Mount Everest or 50 miles below earth, and continue their existence, I'd say indefinitely.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Do they have indefinite food stores? Stock values aren’t going to mean much then.

I’m pretty sure that’s why Zuckerberg is trying to own that whole Hawaiian island. He’s still going to need help farming it.

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Once there's no governments to make stuff like pesky anti-slavery laws I'm sure he'll find a way to justify whatever cruelty pleases him.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Well there's ones that are golfing all the time and laying in the sun on their yachts.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So, are we going to organise a general strike to enforce change or should we start preparing for a different climate?

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Currently a general strike in the US is planned for May 1st 2028 to coincide with the UAW's contract ending. Unfortunately that's 3 years away, and I doubt climate policy is going to be a focus of that strike.

Hopefully we can organize one sooner, but we'll see. Syndicalist unions independent of corporate control would be the most likely to initiate a general strike, so I'd recommend joining up and unionizing your job with them if you can.

I also hope the rest of the world pushes for their own general strikes.

The latter while hoping for the former

I've seen this one before. The world will fail.

I've seen this one before from back to the future

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8HiPwbvAT_E