So far, what do you think ADHD is?
plyth
joined 1 week ago
Who would be interested in creating a freedom company? This looks like an opportunity to me. There must be an arrangement where people work together to acquire the necessary resources without feeling forced.
The hate is always there, it's just not provoked.
With cars, there is no space. Other people are close. Traffic shows us how we feel when our expectations are not fulfilled.
Nobody needs customers. People need resources and are willing to serve customers in exchange.
What has Europe to offer that China needs? We had advanced technologies, but China is quickly surpassing everything.
Mostly true. It's just very difficult to make a lot of money in a fully moral way so a lot of people are not entirely wrong.
Nach h. M. kann auch bereits die Mitgliedschaft in einer verfassungsfeindlichen Organisation Zweifel an der Verfassungstreue begründen.
https://www.rechtslexikon.net/d/verfassungstreue/verfassungstreue.htm
Gesichert rechtsextrem ist aber nicht verfassungsfeindlich. Bei der Einstufung geht es nur um den Umfang der Überwachung.
Es gilt sogar
aber allein die Mitgliedschaft in einer verfassungsfeindlichen Organisation für eine Ablehnung nicht ausreichend sein läßt, sondern eine Prüfung jedes Einzelfalles verlangt
Damit gilt das Gegenteil, selbst ein AfD Verbot reicht nicht.
Die Tagesschau vermeidet leider eine genaue Analyse der Rechtslage.
That door is locked.
The cartoon is apt. It's even worse. Pilots don't fly without the approval of airline management.
The door to the cockpit is locked. If there has been a discussion or if there is just this vote, the powerlessness of those regular passengers shows that anti-intellectualism is an isolated problem. It only looks dangerous to those who don't remember the locked door.
Could be. What I wanted to say is that the sample size is bigger than two if the community cannot come up with successful bootstrapping stories.
How should a secret society remove such a video without silencing the author?
It is easier to do the above three things. Removing a video draws attention to it because the author will post it on other channels. Other people will upload it to check the claim that it is removed.
It's much easier to drown a problematic video in other content so that only few people discover it. So some people know the real truth, but nobody believes them or cares about them.
view more: next ›
Knowledge can be a status symbol like clothing. People show what they know if they can signal their status with it.
In that form, knowledge is not verified by own thoughts. The value of the knowledge comes from the reputation of the source and the value of the people who agree with it.