this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
258 points (91.9% liked)

Games

40807 readers
1823 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the title suggests, over the last couple of days there's been an influx of doomer comments over the SKG petition. While it's fine to disagree, I'm finding it suspicious that there weren't comments like this posted a week or 2 ago

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alessandro@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 hours ago

One year ago, right at the beginning of the petition, PirateSoftware came out misreading the initiative by suggesting the idea the petition was about forcing indie developer to host their server, at their expense, forever and other stupid idea on this line. A fabricated these narrative to act as the typical popular youtubers that say endlessly: "this is st0pid, they are st0pid". The fabricated narrative confused other popular YouTubers with mixed feelings; and there was very little support. This assured PirateSoftware the first place on the youtube rankings when you search for "stop killing games", plus had lot of kids brainwashed into thinking " this is st0pid". This kind of criticism never went away completely, the were partially silenced by the very recent roaring as people understood correctly what it was actually about. As SKG keep hitting its milestone the angered roar did lowered, so now you can ear again the "this is st0pid" team

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Well certain EU politicians support SKG, so yeah it's making a lot of corpos uncomfy

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 42 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Welcome to the age of bots.

Enjoy your perpetual unavoidable and even undetectable bias and opinion influencing astroturfing.

Paid for by whoever doesn't want the things that you want, to influence the people around you to bite at each other's throats and work against their own interests.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 hours ago

This is one of the biggest reasons Reddit has turned to shit.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

I think suspicious is the wrong word. Suspicious seems to suggest doubt or a lack of certainty, but the criticism is pretty predictable. Industry forces could afford to ignore it when it looked impossible to get the signatures, but now that the signatures are in the bag they're having to take a different tactic.

SOME of the criticism is certainly genuine and exactly what it appears to be at face value, but it was inevitable that those doubts would be artificially boosted now.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m not against the goal. But I have voiced that I don’t think this route/configuration of leadership will work.

I only heard about it once people on Lemmy started talking shit about this pirate guy. I hadn’t heard about him either. So it came on my radar as drama. And I ended up having a rough time sharing my point of view. People are really emotional about this intuitive. They take any criticism as an attack that could harm progress on signatures.

In the end the drama with this pirate dork ended up actually bringing positive attention that helped an otherwise flagging initiative for signatures.

I hope the initiative causes positive change.

[–] Pheta@fedia.io 6 points 6 hours ago

But I have voiced that I don’t think this route/configuration of leadership will work.

Could you elaborate on this, beyond the one sentence? The rest of your comment makes it clear that you weren't aware, and still aren't about much of what was going on with SKG. Given that you don't have a clear understanding of what the timeline of SKG was, that does leave room for doubt that you understand the initiative. I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, so please explain what you meant.

I hope the initiative causes positive change.

We all do.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 58 points 12 hours ago

Because it's about to affect big money so they sic their bots on it to shape public opinion and stomp it, like everything else.

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Not at all.

More attention means more people see it, so even if the percentage of complainers haven't changed, there are more people who know.

On top of that, there was criticism before. There's that streamer who was mocked relentlessly in comments and some defending him, there were articles about game developer lobby groups complaining that were posted here, etc.

[–] who@feddit.org 68 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't find the absence of criticism suspicious. The petition makes sense. It aims to solve a problem that affects many individuals and a significant part of human culture.

What I do find suspicious is the sudden emergence of criticism now that it looks like it might succeed. I smell astroturfing and media manipulation.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 32 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

This is exactly my point for the post, though your take is better worded

[–] duchess@feddit.org 11 points 12 hours ago

As the petition got more successful it became a bigger topic on here. Bigger topics draw more opinions.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 123 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't seen anyone here against it.

Ross got hit with some anonymous legal complaint so I wouldn't be surprised with astroturfing.

I'm also an American so I can't help.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The entire complaint was based on nothing too. They claimed he’s orchestrating some crazy financial scheme, and getting paid 6 digits from it, when he’s not only doing it for free, but can’t even participate in the initiative to begin with

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

If he helps bump the gaming industry in a better/healthier direction, he deserves 6 figures imo

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 92 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Are people criticizing it? There is a certain critical mass that when something becomes popular enough a subset of the population will automatically oppose it.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 58 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

There's also a threshold where Industry Groups will start astroturfing. Especially when it comes to worker's rights or consumer's rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Why would they? Most people didn't know about the petition until a few weeks ago, and I think people are largely knee-jerk supporting their favorite streamer (in this case, PirateSoftware). I don't think there's a concerted effort here to kill it, just people coming out of the woodwork now that it got a lot of attention.

[–] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This may have killed piratesoftwares career

Perhaps, which I think is really unfortunate. I think he misread or misunderstood what the petition was about, and doubled down instead of taking a step back.

But he's not going to be making a bunch of accounts on random message boards like Lemmy to try to kill it. The more reasonable argument is that some of his fans and other people who disagree w/ the petition are attacking it, not that he or the games industry cares enough to come here and spread FUD, I think regular people are dumb and emotional enough to do that for them.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 20 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve made some comments critical of how relentlessly PirateSoftware is being harassed and how annoying it is and how distracting from the actual movement it is.

Nothing wrong with the petition itself, and I haven’t noticed any negative astroturfing about it.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 38 points 13 hours ago (16 children)

PirateSoftware is being harassed for a whole lot more than just his SKG misinformation campaign.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›