this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

2638 readers
151 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My wonderful co-admin @supakaity@lemmy.blahaj.zone has made a modification to the downvote system. It's not currently enabled, but if we were to turn it on, downvotes would be available for use, but they would weigh 5 times less than an upvote.

Which is to say, it would take 5 downvotes to counter an upvote. This would let downvotes have an impact on what appears in the hot topics sort, but hopefully mitigate some of the more negative impacts of downvoting.

Are there any strong objections from Blahaj Lemmy users to enabling downvotes with this modification?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sponge@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

i like it! downvotes are too strong for how they're often used, and this seems like a great compromise.

[–] msmc101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago
[–] catherine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

I think that is a fair system! I still want the option to throw a downvote if something really needs it - but it keeps brigading or shit from happening.

[–] rowie324@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

i think thats a v good idea c: i am like very new here but i think that'd effectively help limit/prevent people mass downvoting something, i think it'd provide a space for healthy disagreements

[–] malakai@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like a really good compromise. "Rediquette" says it's only to discourage spam and posts that add nothing to the conversation, but in practice, basically everyone uses it as an "I disagree" button. Gets used as a tool to discourage dissent and silence the actual unpopular opinions.

[–] true_blue@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

This is the big thing I hate about downvotes on Reddit. Instead of downvotes, people who disagree should make a comment about it, and then THAT comment can get upvoted to show that people disagree with the original comment. It encourages conversation and discourages echo-chambers where people are punished for having a different opinion.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think this is a really good idea. That said I think it's important to revisit this at some point and determine how it alters the vibe relative to other instances. A post with equal upvotes/downvotes would be hid in one system and platformed in another. Unfortunately there are lots of awful takes (read transphobia) that could easily reach a 50/50 split. In particular, I think this may become an issue when we inevitably see a conservative corner of lemmy rise up.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Transphobia won't reach anyone. I have zero tolerance for it, even the "just asking questions" sort. I will remove anything even hinting at transphobia, and ban/suspend anyone whose intentions I doubt.

[–] omni_memer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

based as fuck moderator

[–] xyon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

this is the best way ❤️