this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
1471 points (98.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33469 readers
4404 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Telling people to remove them isn’t very practical. Educating people is step 1, but step 2 is finding a browser extension or browser that scrubs the identifiers from URLs. You will inevitably forget to remove the tracker from the url if you do it manually.

[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No no no no, keep em up, I can hack them and decrypt and do nasty things with that silly part of ~~code~~ link, to learn so much about our lovely friendship. And I promise I would never use that to harm You, really! hahahahahahahahaa

[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

Oh source from newsletters? emails? oh that means You actively are using email adres, do any big spam company want validated email adres they can spam on? yeah, sure, 0.30€ each! (afaik, black market value is 100-600€ per 1000 valid addresses, just searched)

Tbh, unsure if si=Aa1Uc_fRHXC0ay85 or similars can be decrypted, or are just individual, one time identificators, never tried, but bet some do know how to pull value out of them.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

Does anyone want to talk about the "share with Facebook" and other similar social media links that track you?

No?

Cool. Cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

This tip really doesn't let me down, turns around and desert me

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"everything after the ? Symbol can be removed without issue" is a bold statement to make. Reminds me when the TV news had a specialist telling people to look at urls before clicking and check if it ends with ".php" as that would mean it is a virus.

[–] REDACTED 5 points 23 hours ago

Youtube.com/watch?v=[Video ID]

[–] SuluBeddu@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

Difference being that the ? in URLs separates the resource from additional information

So unless some website decides to identify the resource in those query field (for example search results pages in a web search), you are generally safe

In any case, messaging apps will try to navigate to the site to create a caption for your message, and that can be a way to check if it works or not

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't some browsers do this automatically?

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I would assume there's an extendion/add-on for than already

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been using URL Check on Android to clean links of crap like this.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Not everything after the ? can be removed. Obvious and well known example, YouTube videos use the video as part of the query parameters (on non shortened URLs). https://youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

One small error on an otherwise very useful post! 💜

[–] hacktheegg@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact, YouTube has backwards comparability for its video links, so https://youtube.com/w/dQw4w9WgXcQ will go to the same video (granted, it will change format to the up to date one, but it is one way to go to a yt video without URL arguments)

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (10 children)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

This is what I meant by the "non shortened" ones. If you're using it through the app you can only press share to get the link and that's how it comes when you press share. (Or if you press share on the website instead of copying the URL from the address bar.)

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are called query parameters and they are used for other things as well. So you can remove the ones you see similar to these but sometimes there might be important stuff you need to get the page to load in those parameters.

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

After removing them (or even if there was nothing to remove) I test out links I'm sending in a private browser window to check that they would work for other people.

[–] MissingInteger@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Add this URL Shortener filterlist to uBlock Origin.
This removes the fast majority of these query parameters.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I honestly couldn't determine if it was a typo or not, but it's not "fast" but "vast majority."

[–] Sidhean@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

my brain autocorrected it to "vast," but I like "fast majority" as a phrase

[–] Sarothazrom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can I ask how do use this? Do I just copy/paste this into the "my filters" tab in uBlock? ;

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Go to the "Filter lists" tab in the dashboard. At the bottom of the list click "Import" and paste the URL ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DandelionSprout/adfilt/master/LegitimateURLShortener.txt ) in the box. Then click "Apply Changes" to save it.

[–] Sarothazrom@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Thank you kindly! 🏅

[–] gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago

I usually change the parameters to things like utm_source=yourmom, just for kicks.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

Legitimate concern, called URL tracking. There's browser extensions for that.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why is this a shitpost? It's absolutely correct and factual.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

It is correct and factual. Unfortunately it doesn't really explain anything. There's plenty of situations where you wouldn't want to delete content because they are necessary for functionality.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Must be the giant red circles and mixed fonts

[–] Memetic@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s not always nefarious.

I work for a non-profit. Sometimes it’s helpful to understand the click rate on a mass message.

We don’t provide data to third parties and use a self-hosted oss analytics platform.

So I think folks should understand tracking and manage it but it’s not all bad. Just almost always bad. Really bad.

Worse: a lot of links can’t be fixed or modified since they use click-through services to obscure the destination.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 127 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So annoying to always have to find out how far you can trim a URL before it breaks.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Typically anything after the "?". That's where the parameters live. There are always exceptions.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There are many URLs that require parameters to load a resource (and aren’t necessarily tracking anything). With YouTube’s non-shortened links (for example), the video ID is after the ?, but is usually (but not always) immediately after.

This:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

Can be shortened to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

But no shorter.

(actually, you can remove the www. but that’s not relevant for illustrating my point)

LOL: thank you Voyager or Lemmy.world for stripping it even from my inline code.

Here’s what I was trying to post:

[–] Lionel@endlesstalk.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Mh5GJlFUCKgjo7ufdb2

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

Everything after the "?" symbol can be removed without issue

https://youtube.com/watch?v=XfELJU1mRMg >>> https://youtube.com/watch

[–] artiman@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

this isn't a shitpost this community is being dragged through the mud by non-shitposts

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Actually, it's a a bit of a shitpost. Anything after the '?' is an argument for the html request. Can and is used for tracking, but is also used for website functionality.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 84 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Everything after the ? can be safely removed

This is usually true but but not always. There's often times when a URL query like that is used to choose the page to load. I believe wordpress does this

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 55 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you're still using firefox, right click -> copy clean link. works most of the time.

edit: on desktop, idk if mobile supports it or not. Good suggestions below though for mobile.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Add made up data to those parameters. Like source=ericsschmidtspedoisland

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I usually just do it because shorter links look better than 30 lines of crap

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago
[–] dan@upvote.au 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is kinda true but also kinda fear mongering. UTM parameters are just to track where you clicked the link from. They're usually not dynamic, and don't contain anything about you personally. The example in the screenshot utm_source=newsletter is probably added to all links in a company's newsletter email, so they can tell that people get to the page via the newsletter.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›