this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

Science

4995 readers
330 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

"Void" is much too dramatic of a word for science communication... 20% less dense than city population doesn't even get you to suburban levels of density, let alone anything near "void".

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

That lines up with my existential dread.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It's not really a smoking gun, but if their analysis is correct it's highly suggestive, especially when alternatives to LambdaCDM still consistent with measurements have proven really hard for the theorists to make.

Edit: Although what does this say about the cosmic distance ladder?

[–] FundMECFS@quokk.au 24 points 1 day ago

In fact, it appears we live in a giant cosmic void with roughly 20% lower than the average density of matter.

Okay that’s a little less dramatic than I envisioned given the use of the word “void”

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

we're under quarantine. we are crikket. the rest of the galactic community saw what were up to and is putting us in the isolation void until they observe that we can act right

[–] teft@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

The rest of the galactic population is in the void with us. It’s the rest of the universe outside the local void that has quarantined us.

[–] Coolkat@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 15 hours ago

We're still in a galaxy.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Dark Forest is not self consistent. Ability to travel implies nanotechnology which allows metabolizing any resource which deterministically leads to expansion which leads to self-selection for fastest expanders which soon means relativistic expansion which is hard to observe since observation window is short while pre-expansive observers are extinguished. Alernative is that nucleation density is very low and/or (reaching the stage of) travel and expansion is impossible. This is consistent with what we see, so Occam's razor cuts Dark Forest.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 15 hours ago

Ability to travel implies nanotechnology which allows metabolizing any resource which deterministically leads to expansion

Both of those aren't really supported. Maybe all matter will be useful, or maybe rare elements will still be preferred, and what exactly nanotechnology will look like is up in the air (it could be that life has explored the space of possible nanomechanisms pretty well already). Similarly, it's totally plausible an advanced species could stay in place. I actually worry we won't have the attention span to fund slow interstellar expansion.

I'd agree there isn't really a rational reason to cross interstellar space just to be a dick. Irrational reasons are possible, but seem unlikely. The only way dark forest makes sense is if competition is an issue, and the nature of space warfare leaves a strong pressure to strike early.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago

Robin Hanson is in the house!

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Those are definitely words.

This reads like a manifesto.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

The data and rationale seem quite compelling!