this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
529 points (95.7% liked)

Science Memes

16967 readers
1583 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I'm not going to yuck Remmy's yum.

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Does anyone remember bonsai-kitty?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Apply directly to the cake

[–] funkajunk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Eventually yes

I am going to hypothesize here: depends on how long rat's in the tube.

I'm imagining a scenario where a vet has to X-ray a pet rat. Rat goes in the tube for 5 minutes while images are taken and then Rat can come back out of the tube. Rat's probably going to be okay. A treat may be in order.

If he had to stay in there for a month, I don't think he'll ever be a normal rat again.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Fuck all animal testing and every scientist participating in it.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

What's wrong with thalidomide? We can just put the shelves lower!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stray@pawb.social -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Can images of animal abuse please be labeled as such and get a NSFW blur please?

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Putting your head in the sand is not a good way to engage with the world.

This is what your beef comes from, for example. (from wikipidia fyi)

Ether accept that like nature itself we are often monstrous, or do something about it (and be laughed at most likely).

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dawg we're vegan we fucking know, we just don't want to see this shit uncensored on our feed.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, I am not vegan. I just hate when people try and sanitize their view of the world.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Idk how u can look at that shit and not be vegan but alright

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you think the people working with livestock are vegan?

I worked with cows (a dairy operation) as a young worker. I like cows, but I also know that they don't really exist in the wild as we know them.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think that, no, but I still can't comprehend what it must be like to live inside a brain that can be so desensitised to this cruelty.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

? Its life, its often both wonderful and cruel.

I have a hard time understanding what the inside of a mind that can not engage with reality as it is is like.

I am a big proponent of everyone at some point butchering their own food at least once.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

To describe someone who has seen the cruelty and decided they won't stand for it as "not engaging with reality as it is" is deranged lmao

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

“not engaging with reality as it is” as in asking for photos to be censored.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pls put the image in a spoiler tag to stop the barrage of reports. 🙏

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is my very point. It is not censored in wikipedia (and it should not be), why would it need that here?

If you want to ban me over it please do, but I don't think science (memes or otherwise) and censorship are compatible.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nah, fam. I let people have opinions, but I have to remove it. I asked nicely. It's about common courtesy, not ideology.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fair enough, I think my point stands well with the removal. Mind if I link to the wiki article on slaughterhouses (since there will be no image)?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's fine. I don't mind that, I'll restore your comment if you agree to switch.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sounds like a plan. I will change the image to a hyperlink.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks dude. I appreciate it.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

(You can link the original btw, just give folks a little warning first! You never know who is behind the screen.) :))

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›