this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
70 points (93.8% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

4173 readers
1 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nusm@peachpie.theatl.social 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your honor, I rest my case....

That's my favorite part. Like they're in a Perry Mason mystery and they've just cracked the case. You know they think they're going to drop the mike and everyone will cheer.

Yeahhhhhhh, that's not going to go how they think it's going to go.

[–] blargbluuk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Nusm@peachpie.theatl.social 6 points 1 month ago

Ehh, I’m leaving it. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] morgan_423@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do you pay with federal reserve notes?

That's the technical name for dollar bills, sovcit. You hand them to the party you owe money to, and your debt is satisfied if you handed over the correct amount. You're welcome, let us know if we can answer any other questions for you.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

..are exempt from taxation by a state or political subdivision of a state."

Isn't the IRS a federal agency? They are not a state or a political subdivision of a state.

[–] chuymatt@startrek.website 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This always feels like the first few iterations of chat GPT. Words, but absolutely no understanding on how to combing them.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 4 points 4 weeks ago

Chat GPT is excellent at mimicking how dumb people talk.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There’s a “United States Code?!”

[–] Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's just our federal laws. For instance if you say looked at Trump's indictment from the classified documents case you'd see a bunch of stuff like "18 U.S.C. § 793(e)" which tells you what part of the United States Code he was charged with violating.

Same way as everyone else.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Honestly, makes sense. If I believed that rule of law was real, this might even stand up

It's just not though. The law is what people believe it to be

[–] False@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Does it make sense? I'm not following their logic (which is normal for these)

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social -3 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, because federal reserve notes (aka fiat currency) wasn't a thing when the basic frameworks were established. Hell, it was just straight up fraud that created it, the problem just got out of hand and so they put a bandaid on the problem... It's a fundamentally nonsensical system

There's probably tons of unpatched laws that don't take this into account, or even explicitly carve this out

Our laws are a crazy mess

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

...except the IRS isn't a state agency

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 4 weeks ago

What is a state vs the state? It's pretty sloppy in the US... I'd need way more context at a minimum