this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
104 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

2655 readers
128 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] individual@toast.ooo 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

this would destroy cyber security in-general, and essentially all companies along with it.

How would this work?

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Corporate VPNs would be allowed presumably.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

doesn't look like its written that way

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Eh you made me read it now. It's not super clearly written but it does sound to me like it is only services that are designed to circumvent the moralising that are prohibited. It's a little ambiguous though.

The more interesting thing I learned from reading it is that it isn't just about banning porn. It's also about banning the depiction of trans people - even descriptions! Insane. Come on America.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah, I mean the whole point is to be able to control people. 'Design' and 'adult content' have nothing to do with it.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

"designed to" is in the text of the law. But it's not clearly written.

[–] GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There's no way that this passes. Even if it did, the Governor (D) would never sign it. If she did, the Democratic party would crucify her. Don't worry about the bill, focus on the piece of shit fascist (Josh Schriver) that wasted tax-payer dollars to introduce the bill.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

I'd love to think you're right but there are bills in blue states for age verification too. It's nice to think that partisan politics will kill it in Michigan...and maybe it will but this is so much more than a one party problem IMO. Both parties seem complicit.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Whitmer is only governor through 2026. Dems still have their primaries to rally behind a candidate, and Detroit's mayor, Dan Gilbert, is running independent.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

Michiganders, please🙏 don't give them this inch. Don't even entertain them.

[–] tama@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

What's the solution for this? Tor?

That would be the peaceful solution, yes.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My fear is that even Tor won't help, if every exit node is censored then where do you go? Also it's not like you can't fairly easily detect exits. Sure hidden services are exempt but the amount of services there are tiny compared to the internet. I really feel like we as the citizens have to convince the governments to not do this. Otherwise things will only get worse.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

it will never pass in a million years, relax

[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Nope, but it’s definitely a test run for when dems don’t control the state.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You say that but uh, have you looked around recently? I mean, I don't think it'll pass either... But way dumber shit has happened in the last 9 months

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

What similarly draconian laws have actually passed in recent time?