this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
291 points (99.7% liked)

politics

25987 readers
2163 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 119 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“We don't need separation of faith and politics. We don't need separation of church and state."

Yeah, yeah you do.

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I bet he wants separation of church and state for every religion except one.

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gotta narrow it down more than that. Can't let Catholics or Mormons slide in on the lawmaking either!

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago

Protestant too broad; only this singular evangelical church will be allowed!

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 73 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Those who established that separation had lived in a world without it and knew how it negatively affected both the government and the religions. Saying it's not needed shows a combination of ignorance of history and a desire to be the one religious group who gains power over others.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, the founders knew of what they spoke, since The Inquisition was still ongoing in their lifetimes.

There is no way they set up this country as a secular country by accident. Or didn't mention Jesus once in the Constitution as some kind of "oversight", and actually really meant to imply this was a xtian nation, even if the Treaty of Tripoli later spells it out that we are not a xtian nation...

[–] RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 weeks ago

Only an asshole trying to fist fuck God into politics would say something so stupid

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 weeks ago

These fucking morons forget that the primary, actual, material reason that the Founding Fathers did the whole... seperation of church and state thing?

Yeah, yeah, it was to prevent the myriad groups of extremist sects of Christianity that comprised the early US... from fucking oppressing and killing each other, via the government.

Remove that seperation, and within half a decade we will literally have Y'all Qaedas for each fucking cult and denomination fire bombing each other, doing mass sectarian violence amongst themselves and those they all view as heretics.

I guess it will be funny(?) if we end up with the Mormon War, round 2.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago

Pay yo taxes then.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago

Uproot religion!

[–] henfredemars 9 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t want your Republican Jesus.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This means their religion is now of political concern. They forfeit their protections in doing this

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Explaining to Ayatollah Khomemi that he's going to be hoisted on his own petard

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Did they forget that every time a king changed the kingdom's religion it was convert or die?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think what this indicates is that he doesn’t comprehend what “separation” means in this context. Or “church” for that matter.

Would he really have no issues with the Pope ruling the US by papal decree? Or the king of England (the leader of the Anglican/Episcopalian church)?

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ima run for senate and make the state religion Satanism

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Twatley can blow it out his ass.