this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
131 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

7394 readers
113 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cavemanfreak@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do not like that man Ted Cruz. I do not like his dated views.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

“Would you like him in the snow?”

“To the tropics he would go.”

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Always that ready excuse as their fallback. In this case they could fix it by simply exempting the sexual predator registry from this protection.

They could further exempt suspects in ongoing investigations, replacing the protection once the individual is cleared as a suspect. This latter would require a bit more writing, but it could be done.

Wyden should redraft and then present it again, if for no other reason than seeing what other excuses he comes up with.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Rights shouldn't be taken for simply being on the registry. Sorry no privacy for you because you peed in a public park when you were 20

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Why is anyone listening to idiot Cruz? This is just one more GOP idiot.