this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
1348 points (98.1% liked)

Political Memes

9847 readers
2305 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 130 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Men will LITERALLY construct an entire persona based around their phobias as a result of trauma over witnessing the murder of their parents during a mugging orchestrated by crime bosses and spend millions of dollars on toys and gadgets to act out revenge fantasies and calling it vigilante justice rather than go to therapy.

[–] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Bruce Wayne goes to therapy, not Batman, it's different (canonically).

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So uh … his therapist must suck for not treating that borderline Personality Disorder and uncovering his dissociative identity disorder

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 27 points 1 month ago

Given that the most successful therapists in Gotham are people like Dr. Harleen Quinzel, I'm not confident they can overlook their own issues.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Batman IS the primary personality and he's never gone to therapy, so theres really nothing the Therapist can do about it at that point.

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

No it's fine, Batman is the real person. Bruce Wayne is the fake and that's why he needs therapy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago

I remember in some of the animated series that he would go to therapy but was not open and putting up his playboy billionaire persona. Honestly it seemed like a waste of a time for him if he wasn't being honest, unless it was to keep up appearances. Closest I think he gets to actual therapy is talking to Alfred.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] person___man@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Not only that, most fully realized versions of the character channel both the vigilante AND playboy personas to fight crime, using Wayne Enterprises to create welfare programs and jobs so Gothamites need not resort to crime to put food on the table.

There’s a scene where Batman pacifies a room of Black Mask goons without lifting a FINGER - he hacks the projector screen simply shows them a Wayne Foundation advertisement for better, safer jobs. One by one, every man simply drops their weapons and walks out the door as their crime boss irately yells at them to come back.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Gothman is literally cursed from head to toe to be the way it is.

It's more like, this post is full of people describing why the only way the storyline can stay realistic is by introducing supernatural evil.

If it were not a cursed city and if Batman was really a hero who wanted to help people, he would do the social programs and investment in community, but that would be a pretty lousy monthly comic book for kids to read and buy batman merchandise.

[–] nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

He already does all that on top of being batman.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

He does do those though?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I haven't even read Batman, but I've seen this same thread pop up enough times to know that:

  1. Gotham is literally cursed

  2. Gotham is extremely corrupt. Tax money wouldn't go where it needs to

  3. Bruce Wayne bankrolls tons of social programs

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's cursed because comic writers couldn't come up with a better way to explain why the city can't be fixed by the world's smartest billionaire.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The city can't be fixed because then there wouldn't be any more stories for them to write.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 month ago (7 children)

We are assuming that somehow if Wayn pays large sums of wealth to the government, the government wouldn't just be their usual wasteful, corrupt, self serving self with said money. You get every current billionaire in the USA to pay a fair tax. Where do you think the money goes? Funding for food stamps or Lockeed-Martin?

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also in the DC universe, the equivalent of Lockeed-Martin is Wayne Enterprises. There's stories where Bruce is conflicted in making weapons, but nonetheless, his fortune is built on the military industrial complex.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So Bruce Wayne is somehow worse than freaking Tony Stark?

Then again Stark is an inventor and comics-level genius who lacks a secret identity, so pivoting to another industry was way easier for him. Bruce Wayne probably can't change his company too much without losing a ton of pull and drawing unwanted attention to himself, plus losing access to the gadgets he relies on.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Didn't Stark divest from weapons manufacturing to researching clean energy instead, after he got hit by that one bomb of his?

I haven't read the comics, just what I remember from the movies

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that's why I said worse than Stark. He pivoted away from supporting the Military-Industrial Complex when he realized it was hurting people, whereas Batman hasn't.

It's just odd since Batman is supposed to have ironclad ethics, whereas Iron Man is famously a hypocritical ass (though much less so in the MCU than in the comics, from what I've heard).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago

Underfunding the government through tax cuts makes corruption more likely. The richer the rich are, the easier it is to manipulate the government for them. Why do you think so much money goes to Lockheed Martin? Who gets government contracts isn’t chosen at random, there are moneyed interests involved.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

If the income tax graduations are steep enough then the billionaire class will optimize to minimize taxes by reducing their own income in favor of reinvesting in their business and employees. In theory. In reality I'm sure they'd find some way to squirrel it away while their employees apply for and get denied food stamps.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago (8 children)

isn't a big part of the whole setup that this would not help much? like Gotham is just too corrupt, whenever programs are set up to invest in the public, they're mostly just stolen from.

Wayne is a philanthropist who gives a ton of money back through his own programs, right? presumably better overseen than the government ones.

I don't know how much money of Wayne's is actually used for philanthropy, but he can't just give the city all his wealth because it's too corrupt for it to be used well, right?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

whenever programs are set up to invest in the public, they’re mostly just stolen from.

I'm reminded of the time Walgreens reported they were raising prices and closing stores because of rampant crime, but later admitted they made it the fuck up.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh you're saying we should tax wealth, and we should not tax work.

For a second I thought you were saying "taxing wealth does not work" like a tribal. Few word sometimes do trick.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the Batman Year 1 comic the thing that makes the police believe there really is a 'Bat-Man' is when he attacks a fancy dinner party and warns Gotham's movers and shakers that justice is coming for them, too.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's pretty clear Gotham was full of corruption from top to bottom, which pushed him into becoming Batman. Philanthropy would just fuel the corrupt politicians into funneling money to the crime bosses, and taking a cut. Probably if he started a soup kitchen and was on the ground getting people out of poverty, he would achieve improvement, but when the police, courts, and politicians are on the crime bosses payrolls, funding those institutions more will not solve Gotham's problems

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I vaguely remember some stories, he does do the whole non-profit thing, too. It's still a little bit too pro-billionaire but yeah, in their setting it's quite likely the government is too corrupt.

Also he fucking funds other superheroes, so it's a little hard to say what actually works in that crazy universe. I can't imagine superheroing to be profitable.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago

In some of the Silver Age comics, Superman has a vast fortune from old Spanish treasure ships he can find deep undersea. Yet no one ever calls Supes on being a skinflint.

[jk]

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Here is a short list of shit going on in Gotham at any given time, not including the wide array of psychopaths and supervillains doing shit at any given time:

  1. The insane asylum with the portal to hell (Depending on if you consider Living Hell canon or not.)
  2. The Lazarus pit in the city spewing chemicals into the water supply.
  3. All the other chemicals likely in the water supply from a wide array of sources, including regular pollution and goofy shit.
  4. The remnants of the evil warlock who was sealed under the city for centuries.
  5. The massive mafia presence and general corruption.
  6. The Illuminati that uses zombie soldiers.

That is not shit proper taxation is going to resolve. You can't protected bike lane away the zombie controlling Illuminati.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago
  1. The Lazarus pit in the city spewing chemicals into the water supply.
  2. All the other chemicals likely in the water supply from a wide array of sources, including regular pollution and goofy shit.

Fixing contaminants to the water supply is absolutely something proper taxes should be able to solve.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Gotham is extremely corrupt, from the police departments being riddled with officers on any of the several mob payrolls. Same for the politicians. Feeding more tax dollars into that won't mean that money is going to the poor people who would benefit from it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What bugs me is this is a controversial opinion about Batman. That there's still objection to the notion that Batman is fulfilling his own violent jollies in the color of seeking justice, rather than using his massive fortunes to serve good.

I think my most controversial Batman opinion is that his code vs. killing is bunk. Even if he just punches goons, he does so enough that goons would die often enough to give Batman a substantial body count. I'm sure his press crew and legal team are occupied continuously with the task of cleaning up his messes.

In fact, there's not enough dramatic crime (like bank heists, contrast domestic violence or check-cashing fraud, which not even regular police care much about) to support a superhero career¹

Curiously, Batman could make a career going after elite deviance / white collar crime, going after the Sacklers for pushing opioids and starting the current opioid crisis, going after companies that lobby governments to deregulate so they can pollute or push false products (e.g. cars as opposed to public transit; ETA A new video popped up about the wellness industry that pushes mostly pure quackery, and has captured the HHS, so we're in a bit of a need of this kind of vig.); Or the DeVos family who use MLMs and PMCs to make their millions; Or the private equity companies like Bain Capital and Blackrock who get rich by creating massive bankruptcy sinkholes leveraging the brand reputations of aging companies and foreclosing commodities for their own personal gain. If Wayne wanted to go after the very sorts of things he, his company and his parents did / do to amass their fortunes, he could prevent a lot of cost, destruction and loss of life by orders of magnitude more than all the petty crime put together.

Funny DC doesn't want to do that, though. Maybe Detective Comics is just state and law enforcement propaganda and they like it that way.

  1. ( ¹ ) Batman is not just a mountain of a man and master martial artist, but also has the academic capacity of several doctorates, assuming he -- and not a secret task force of backup investigators -- does all his detective-work and implements all his backup plans. Personally, I like the idea of Batman as a sophisticated justice and detective agency.
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It's a controversial opinion because it's ill-informed. Bruce Wayne does give the majority of his money to charity. Even Superman, the goodest person on earth, looks up to him. But no amount of funding food banks or building low-income housing is going to uncurse the cursed land that Gotham is built on

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Yeah I recall half the issue being that Gotham is so corrupt, any money is going to be wasted, which is why the Wayne family has to have its own charities to accomplish anythign at all.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Gotham is so corrupt that it would make Russia blush. If you taxed Bruce Wayne at 99%, nothing would change except the cops would all suspiciously have new supercars.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well. Part of batman mythos is that no amount of money is enough to save the city from itself.

I don't think this person ever read batman.

[–] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This person is arguing for higher taxation of the wealthy in the real world, not necessarily engaging in detailed analysis of the fictional world of Batman

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I should stop coming to these threads. At the end of the day, Batman is rich by day and personally fights crime at night. Everything else is just added on to make that premise work. It feels like a bit of a Thermian argument ("she's naked because she breathes through her skin")

Edit: there's also something interesting to say about why "comic book" means "superheroes" in the US but "Donald Duck/Tintin/Astérix" in Western Europe

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Johanno@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago

Gotham city has a prison that is corrupt like hell. The joker stays in it just for fun. He seems to be able to leave at any time.

Next Gotham city has a crime spawner. For no reason at all crimes seem to happen.

Badman should first fight the corrupt officials and raise a new administration for the city before he fights the low criminals.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

"Gotham is so corrupt all the money would be wasted."

That's fine. Wealth inequality on that scale is evil and corrosive to society. It would be better to do something productive with it, but setting the money on fire would still be better than letting billionaires like Wayne hoard it.

The joker was totally based with his cash pyre in Dark Knight.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

It only works when that money goes to the right place. With all the corruption in Gotham, that money probably goes straight into the politicians bank accounts.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

‘Wayne foundation’

It doesn’t look like a lot of people even read the comic books before forming these opinions about his storyline.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In Batman's defence, he doesn't decide the tax policies and I'm pretty sure he is already an avid philanthropist and political donator for anti-poverty policy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›