this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
-1 points (47.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43790 readers
1470 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was wondering if there's any Blockchain project that could be integrated with and fingerprint all GenAI content. Every Blockchain token node could be linked to an image, or video produced in their meta data. And companies could verify if the generated text appearing on their platforms is AI or not.

I think with government regulations we could reduce the number of scams, and misinfo.

Though I do understand it's limitations and that it would not be super difficult getting past such restrictions if the party were willing enough.

And it wouldn't work for text, and code I suppose.

But it would be very helpful for indentify AI content much more easily.

Privacy could be maintained as it is with bitcoin and crypto.

But I wonder how you would get everyone to integrate such a system. Both the governments and the companies.


I remember reading about this discussion in some thread months ago, but I can't find it.

I didn't know where to post this, but I assume everyone on lemmy is some kind of wiz, so even in this subreddit someone might have the answer.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 hours ago

fingerprint all GenAI content

People can generate a billion images every seconds. Also what about images generated locally and not put in that blockchain?

Once again, the blockchain is a solution looking for a problem to solve.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Hey, what if we tried to cure cancer by mixing it with aggressive herpes?

[–] mormund@feddit.org 13 points 8 hours ago

You cannot fix society with technology, the end.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How would you enforce the entry of all generated AI content into said blockchain? Big providers might be persuaded or forced to participate, but it's not like someone - specifically well-funded bad actors - couldn't just set up their own servers at will.

[–] pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ahh yes, my intention was for such tech to make it difficult and mitigate harm not entirely stop it

If something lacked the fingerprint, it would immediately be suspicious.

But yeah I don't completely understand the tech, so I want to know if there's any such project or research on the same.

Block chain is an interesting form of fingerprinting that allows privacy for actors but not complete privacy.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago

If something lacked the fingerprint, it would immediately be suspicious.

Suspicious of what? Being non-AI?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think you’d have better luck doing it the other way around: fingerprint known non-AI content, and treat everything else as potential AI.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Exactly. Use blockchain to trace image/video origins - ie media data plus camera signature and camera operator id with timestamps, and track the sources through every edit, along with edit transform info and editor id. That way any produced clip can be traced back to origins through all edits and then verified to particular real sources. A provable chain of custody of every image. If a video clip came from a trusted known camera operator and stays under the control of entities you trust, you can trust the video. If any links in the ownership or edits are sus, an author can track down and produce the in/out of any edit link to prove the authenticity.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 hours ago

Anything that relies on external factors for flagging AI images is doomed to fail.

There will quickly be tools created to strip the metadata from the image, or to create AI pictures but skipping adding the blockchain stuff

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Images, text etc can be generated entirely offline and independently. There is nothing to force the image to be attached to the block chain either directly or as a fingerprint.

You would have to do the opposite: when you take a picture or video (or write some text?), as it is recorded, the camera chipset signs the image/video using TPM-esque hardware, proving (ish) that it was captured by a real camera sensor.

The issue is that it's pretty close to mandatory doxxing.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 4 hours ago

And you can't ever post process images.