this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
376 points (98.0% liked)

politics

24139 readers
2721 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A former Deutsche Bank executive testified this week that the German financial behemoth only agreed to make massive loans to Donald Trump because of Trump’s vast personal fortune. The problem? The bank apparently thought, based at least partly on financial statements provided by Trump, that he was far wealthier than he really was.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 105 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but Deutsche Bank also built a business specifically around allowing themselves to be deceived in these ways...

So theres that..

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 43 points 2 years ago

So what? All Deutsche Bank did was front for Russian money laundering to 45. They would have done that regardless of what they were told.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one but Deutsche Bank is surprised by this.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If all we get out of this is a public, accurate picture of Trump's finances, I'll be ok. I would prefer some jail time (from criminal prosecutions) but don't want to sound vindictive or greedy.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago (4 children)

ayo ill sound vindictive.

Let's punch him in the cock.

[–] holiday@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Grab his dick and twist it

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] holiday@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The oolllleee dick twist

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is..that what he calls his dick, or...?

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

That’s what Stormy Daniels said it looks like. :/

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

The story goes that they were out drinking, doing weird impressions, and toad said (in a Donald duck voice) "hey, I'm Donald Dick!" Obviously Mario and Luigi refused to let it go, and that's been his nickname ever since. It's also why D.K. won't drink with them anymore, Mario is a mean drunk.

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I chortled and I'll second that!

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Give 'im the oooolllll' Cock Punch.

[–] hogunner@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Wanting someone to be held accountable for their decades long crime sprees isn’t vindictive or greedy; I’d argue it’d just be (long) delayed justice.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

My god... Such tiny hands

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

They were shocked - SHOCKED- to find out that he was a liar.

DB is a criminal enterprise, now it's trying to cut ties with Donnie.

[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Ok. He deceived a nation. And he succeeded. He's not in jail, so he's still succeeding. Any further news?

Well then why do you keep giving the chucklefuck loans…?