this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
239 points (95.8% liked)

World News

50653 readers
2783 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gnugit@aussie.zone 125 points 2 weeks ago
[–] TRock@feddit.dk 94 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They said she should have poured the coffee into a bin instead?! I think the garbage men disagree, they dont like liquids in the trash

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 85 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Based on the title alone I thought that she was a barista who poured hundreds of liters of coffee down the drain or something which might make sense. But no, just the last sip on her cup in order to prevent it from spilling in the bus or causing problems in the trash bin. Do they fine people if they accidentally drop their full cup too?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 59 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

This story is really poor and badly reported, as it doesn't explain WHY the Environmental Protection Act 1990 has these fines in place and why what this women did was wrong. Instead it's a clickbait story that implies the woman is a victim.

In the UK (and like many places) there are 2 systems of water drainage in urban areas - the surface water drainage (which is for rainwater) and the sewage system (which is dirty and drains toilets, home sinks, etc).

The surface water drainage runs eventually into fresh water such as lakes, rivers, and the sea, untreated. So if you pour coffee down a rain drain, it is contaminating the fresh water. It may seem ridiculous to fine someone for the dregs of one coffee, but if everyone were putting waste water in the rainwater drains / gutters it would have a detrimental impact on the ecosystem. It's already a huge problem as people DO put contaminated water into these drains, probably due to widespread ignorance.

The sewage system is for contaminated waste; that water is collected and treated and either reused for drinking water or then released back into the fresh water system. Finish your coffee OR take it with you to a place where you can dispose of it into the sewage system.

She needs to pay her fine, educate herself and understand she is not a victim here. She did something wrong.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

So all the diesel runoff from leaky lorries, tractors, badly maintained vehicles etc and, whatever else that gets spilt on the roads goes into our waterways untreated?

Plus Thames water has been releasing raw sewage into our waterways.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-67357566

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

What she did was right. It was safe. Your slippery slope would apply to bulk dumping or actually dangerous liquids. In reality, roads and roofs are covered with all kinds of dirt and things, all of which gets washed into the storm sewer every time it rains. But here you are pretending a quarter cup of coffee could possibly be problematic.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It’s already a huge problem as people DO put contaminated water into these drains, probably due to widespread ignorance.

You talk of ecosystems, but we're talking about a beverage made entirely of natural biodegradable ingredients. It's bean water. You may as well complain about the runoff coming out of a nature preserve.

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks for explaining

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (7 children)

This is one of those times it pays to actually read the article. The fine has been thrown out. Whatever patrol men ran up and fined her for polluting waterways were clearly overzealous and the council threw the charge out when she appealed it.

The storm drains in my area all have prominent “no dumping” signs on them, because they do drain to sensitive waterways that would impact wildlife and the environment if they were polluted. But I think the main thrust of this is keeping people from dumping their anti-freeze and motor oil and old gasoline and paint and shit like that.

So on the one hand, I kind of understand the instinct to say “hey don’t dump your shit there, that’s a storm drain” but obviously a few sips of coffee isn’t going to hurt anything.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The article was updated a few hours ago but when it was originally posted and accumulated its first slew of upvotes, the fine hadn't been rescinded yet and the only statement from the council was that their enforcement officers had acted appropriately and the fine was appropriate.

Also, in much of the UK, the surface water and foul water drains both go into a single combined sewer system, with areas that have been built up for centuries like this one being most likely to still use that old approach.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They clearly only rescinded it because of the media attention. The real story is that England’s councils are now so stripped to the bone on austerity that they’re hiring roaming enforcers to enforce fines on obscure regulations and instruments to raise money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seriously. If you wouldn't fine them for littering by dumping the coffee on the pavement right beside the drain (which it would washinto on the first rainstorm) then they shouldn't fine them for anything by dumping it directly into the drain.

No one is going to get fined for dumping coffee on the sidewalk. But they might get fined for dumping oil or paint on the sidewalk.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah that’s a good point. Can you imagine getting a ticket because you spilled your coffee?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That is what happens when policemen can already read to understand the law, but are still too stupid to understand why the law exists.

[–] erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 weeks ago

This wasn't police, it was council enforcement officers. People too stupid to get into the police.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

For the last bit of a single coffee? That's a fully organic compound.

You'd probably get the same fine for emptying a drum of used motor oil into it.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

"She was stopped by three enforcement officers". Some fucking heros.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Apart from the stupidity of the fine itself, why is it 150 but only 100 if you can pay it in 14 days? Thats insane. "You cant afford to pay this fine immediately so pay more"????

[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago

Makes people less inclined to fight or ignore it when there's a time limit like that.

[–] foo@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the same with speeding fines and parking tickets, and the white collar criminals that call themselves car park management companies. Many folk just pay rather than appeal, thinking that the time it takes to appeal will mean they end up paying full price, but I'm pretty sure the clock is paused during the appeal process.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

I've contested many a fine, I fucking hate those parking sharks. The clock is indeed stopped until a decision is made.

Then it's usually back to the original terms of payment stated on the OG fine.

I've even contested friends fines as well, I'd rather spend the 30 minutes appealing than let any of those companies get more revenue.

This is in the UK at least...

I got a speeding ticket in France and to contest it you have to pay the full fine (€90) and if you were successful with the appeal then you'd get that money refunded.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In Florida, rain gutters that flow to open waterways are marked as such with special reminders / warnings. Perhaps that would be a decent compromise here. Then one can't say they didn't know.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The UK only has one type of sewer, so the storm drains flow into the same waste processing plants as the toilets. However, those waste processing plants then declare an emergency due to unexpected high volumes and just dump everything into open waterways if it's rained within the past week, which, as it's the UK, it almost always has. There are multiple issues at play here, and they're all dumb and foreseeable if you assume companies will do whatever is most profitable without breaking the law, and none of them are this person's fault.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Ooooo...RFK knows where to swim next.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

to deposit or dispose of waste in a way likely to pollute land or water

Its not "likely" at all tho, because the drain leads to a water treatment plant that constantly deals with literal feces...

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's the UK. It's a big scandal at the moment that most of the drains lead to rivers, lakes and the sea with only a small fraction of sewage actually being processed before being released from the processing plant. The fines for not processing the sewage were smaller than the costs of building and running treatment plants, so the water companies have just been paying the fines and giving all the money they were paid to build the treatment plants to shareholders as dividends. As no one's broken any laws they haven't already nominally been punished for, there aren't any realistic and politically tenable solutions unless billions of pounds can become magically available.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Well thats fucking outrageous. That means the UK is constantly flooding the ocean with tire rubber, oil and gasoline, dropped trash, fecal matter from animals, etc

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If you're worried about animal fecal matter making it into the waterways, I have bad news about fish

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

"I don't drink water, fish fuck in it." - I forget who said this

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is coffee even considered waste?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] foo@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They are supposed to, except that the water companies just chuck half of into rivers, untreated, to protect their profit margins, and until very recently got away with it scot free.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wischi@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know the situation in the UK but some countries have separate drains depending on if it's waste water or just a regular rain water drainage. Rain water drainages are often not treated in any way (because why, it's rainwater anyway) but waste water is processed in treatment plants.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not just rainwater once it's made it's way from the streets and into the gutter though.. i would hope there's some sort of treatment

[–] Thalion@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

There is not. Obviously I can't speak for every city in the world but any I'm familiar with either flow back to natural water sources, or to storm ponds to slowly evaporate/become ground water

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That is incorrect - there are 2 water drainage systems in the UK. Surface water / rain goes into the surface system and that flows freely into the water table untreated (rivers, lakes etc). It is not designed for dirty water.

The sewage system is totally separate - that is for contaminated water (toilets, sinks) and that goes to sewage treatment plants. It should be treated before it is released into the freshwater system.

So yes, it IS polluting the fresh water by putting things into the rain drainage system.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rah@hilariouschaos.com 14 points 2 weeks ago

Enforcement action is only taken when ~~necessary~~ the small-dick bully boys find someone they feel safe intimidating

FTFY

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Whilst they are technically correct this is overzealous use of the law and by three of them, it looks like a police force with too many officers looking for easy targets.

They can’t turn up to hate crimes so gang let’s go looking for minuscule crimes that people can be tripped up on. I wouldn’t even cause it civil disobedience as it’s not a crime that’s even educated on.

They might be right and even after review the service can say they are technically right however this is not a good look and erodes trust in authority.

[–] foo@feddit.uk 5 points 2 weeks ago

They were council enforcement rather than police. I suspect if she appealed she would have been let off, but some folk think then they'll have to pay the full amount because they missed the early payment discount window, which I don't think is the case.

Also, what's the difference between this and pouring coffee in the kitchen sink at home? Those enforcement officers were just chancing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The distinction here is she poured it into an outdoor gutter/drain, so a bit like littering. It's a sort of thing if one person does it it's probably fine but if everybody does it can be bad for the environment. Because what goes down outdoor drains is not usually treated. But even if it's wrong at least give her a warning.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's only not treated because the UK has a massive problem with not treating sewage. In the UK, storm drains flow into the same sewers as toilets and go to the same waste treatment plants, where everything gets pumped out the same emergency overflow pipe into open water because there are millions more people in the UK than there were fifty years ago, and sewage treatment capacity is virtually unchanged because it's cheaper to pay the fines for emergency overflow than to build more treatment plants.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I wonder if those officers knew it was illegal before they took up the job?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It shouldn't be illegal. It's a responsible disposal of an organic liquid.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's a bit of a grey area.

Coffee is full of lipids, which build up in the sewer just like pouring oil down the drain. Coffee shops need a grease trap for that reason. (Google says UK does this, I know it's legislation here in Aus, we mostly copy your homework anyway)

One small bit of a cup isn't going to break anything, but infrastructure planning and legislation has to assume that a percentage of people will do it, some of them all the time.

I don't think she should have been fined and I do think that 3 men ganging up on a small woman to berate her about a coffee is bonkers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Not the Onion...

[–] Soktopraegaeawayok@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

This.... this is the "world news" today?.... Just wasting our time... intentionally im sure.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago

This is payback for the citizens arrest of Anglian Water CEO

load more comments
view more: next ›