this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
432 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26292 readers
1884 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I wish this was an inflated title but no, he really said this.

America, you need to get rid of this asshole ASAP.

Source: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115460423936412555

Thanks @notarobot@lemmy.zip

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 82 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And he's doing this while the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is furloughed... 🧐

[–] BingBong@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The labs which design, test, and build them are not furloughed. Only the federal oversight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He's been itching to nuke something since his first term. Hurricanes, he suggested at one point. And Americans voted him into office twice. Fucking morons.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Some Americans voted for him 3 times!

Seriously, imagine how fucking dumb you would have to be to fill out three separate ballots over nearly a decade voting for a failed reality TV star.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is he unstable enough for the 25th amendment yet? Asking for a friend.

[–] isaaclw@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

He's been unstable enough for that, for 9 years

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's currently in his stable genius arc so we're out of luck.

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can someone just tell him no one else has nuclear fusion power stations yet but (china|EU|Russia) are close and how much money it would make.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would make money at a country level, but does it fill his personal wallets like the oil industry?

So it's worthless for him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tmyakal 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It only matters if it makes money for him. Someone wealthy and interested in cracking nuclear fusion would need to be giving him a payout.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago

Ah, the "I had no choice!" argument for scaling up world tension. Yeah, we've never heard that one before. Hitler also "had no choice" but to invade Sudetenland, Austria and Poland.

The "we had no choice" argument is always used to take the victim role as an excuse to justify anything you like. Whether it is joining wars because they sank your illegal weapons shipment hidden in an ocean liner, invading a country because you made it look like they sank your ship, invade a country because a few terrorists attacked your country, invade a country because you claim there might be weapons of mass destruction, send troops and chemical weapons to a dictatorial regime because the freedom fighters threaten your overseas naval base, invade a country for denazification, commit ethnic cleansing, genocide and other horrible war crimes because some terrorist extremists attacked your country after years and years of oppression and apartheid, etc etc etc. There are so many examples in history where this tactic has been used. The entire cold war thrived on this bullshit argument "look at them, I have no choice".

"I'm going to do something bad, so I find a way to justify it."

  • every dictator, agressor, war criminal in history.
[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's supposed to say alleged, now it's censored to say aged.

I think it's a good play on words, tbh, as the alleged part is mostly used to legally cover what is widely known. An innocent person wouldn't cover up the Epstein list as voraciously as he has.
And he is very very old, therefore aged.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rayyy@piefed.social 32 points 1 week ago

Just shows he is desperately trying to create many more distractions from the Epstein files to see what works.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One can never be sure what President Brain Worms is talking about but I'm pretty sure Obama started a ten year plan to modernize our nuclear forces early in his presidency.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This is horrifying. Like, mind-bogglingly bad.

It's also a blatant lie. Other countries are not testing nuclear weapons, they're running simulations. We didn't do that in the 60s because it wasn't possible, but the US (and presumably China/Russia) literally have giant supercomputers for this purpose now.

...And we would know if they were doing real testing because it would show up on seismographs.


But who cares about truth? Or sanity? No, all my relatives (even scientifically minded ones) won't even bat an eye, lest some Democrat steal their retirement, ugh.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trumplethinskin is too stupid to understand any of that . He desperately wants to to be the one to trigger a spectacular overreaction and turn another country into glass.

#smallcarrotproblems

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And who, exactly, is going to get paid to do that? Last I saw 75% of them were furloughed at the moment.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, there will be a company popping up tied to some Republicunts who'll do the testing for "cheap".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flying_gel@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Unless I'm mistaken Russia has way more nukes than the US still.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

ffs we're still in 2025 man.

[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why? They work... We checked.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 week ago

Orange Don wants to make sure he can launch them the next time someone calls him names, without anyone being able to stop him

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if it wasn't for the other million reasons, this guy's grammar alone should disqualify him from having the nuclear codes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago (8 children)

A giant waste of money. 800 nukes is plenty for pretty much anything and launching 100 would probably mean the end of life as we know it on planet earth. If you wanted to blow a bunch of money on the military there are better ways to do it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Choose one...global warming or nuclear winter. I think that is our futures only options.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 week ago

There's always the mass-extinction asteroid option to look forward to.

[–] DBT@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Testing for what exactly? Do we not know enough about them already?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The real crazy people who would cause a nuclear wae are israel and the usa leaders not Iran

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry. Will try to do better next time.

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

All good. Remember that this kind of apocalyptic events should not spread as heresay to avoid things getting twisted, cofused, people claiming its fake. Etc

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 week ago (9 children)

We would try, but the mods silence us talking about it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dumbass probably watched a movie and was like duuuuh that looks cool lolz...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Are they trying to figure out what the expiration date is on nuclear warheads? The fuq are they still needing to test for?

Let's just blow up our arsenal for the heck of it boyz, it will make for a good twitter post!

[–] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Someone distract Gramps with shiny ballroom pictures again.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›