Official client and support for my platform of choice is a big plus only Steam bothers to have.
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
448 points (88.4% liked)
PC Gaming
12719 readers
309 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I have recently realized that I could claim tons of games from amazon with prime subscription that are claimed in GOG. And it seems GOG has some games available for Linux. There usually are couple of download links for different OSes
load more comments
(22 replies)
Steam doesn't enforce the use of its DRM (which is super easy to bypass anyway but that's a side note).
Steam lets you publish your game on their platform and hand out as many keys as you like to resell on other platforms (at no cost) while still doing all the heavy lifting of hosting and distributing.
Steam doesn't decide what kinds of titles get published on their platform any more than GoG does, so the bit about remasters, etc. is a bit weird. Besides you the user should get to decide what you want to buy and play.
I love GoG, but I love Steam as well. They're not mutually exclusive and you can have both.
Yeah, its like a lot of people don't know you can just... move files out of Steam's directory, and 95% of the time, game still runs, just, not through Steam.
What even is a Steam rip, anyway?
The problem is that with Steam you only know if that works after you bought the game and only know if that works across machines if you upfront have two machines to test it in.
I mean, if you know upfront that it matters to you (which you might not until, say, your machine breaks and you happen to have no access to the Internet or Steam in your new machine yet, at with point you'll be thinking "I wish I checked") you can go through all the hassle of always thoroughly testing it within the refund period of that game, but at that point piracy is less of a hassle.
Meanwhile some of my GOG offline installers are so old that they have been used on 3 different machines (well, one was the same machine under Windows and under Linux) already.
Don't get me wrong - I use both Steam and GOG, my point is that saying that "Steam has DRM free games" is even worse than a half-truth and about as bollocks as saying that a shop selling TVs is selling "Quake game machines" - sure, people with the right skills can get Quake to run in some Smart TVs, but that's not how the store is selling them as, that's definitelly not supported by them and they won't refund you a Smart TV purchase as "not suitable for purpose" if that device fails to runs Quake.
Ok I had to read that twice to understand the angle I think you're coming from, but uh, basically yeah, agree.
If you want a game, that works if the net goes down... yeah, sometimes just 100% relying on vanilla Steam, that'll fuck you.
But, Steam does have ways to set up local backup, freeze potentially breaking updates, work in offline mode...
But but, yeah, in many cases, for many people, it makes sense to just either make and keep your own isolated backup of some kind, or yeah, just grab a rip from somewhere and keep it in emergency storage.
My own experience of problems with the "Steam way" is wanting to install and run a new game whilst offline (for example, when I moved houses and was waiting to get landline Internet running, whilst mobile Interned was too slow or expensive to download anything but the tinyiest of games, all the while my external HD with a collection of GOG offline installers gave me plenty of options) and installing games in machines with older versions of Windows because the Steam Application doesn't support those old OS versions anymore (plus, in all honesty, you definitelly don't want to to connect such machines to the Internet for security reasons).
Further, as I said in a different post, I can run my GOG games through Lutris by default sandboxed with networking disabled, but I can't do that in Steam.
More in general, as a Techie since the 90s I've long been very aware (and averse) to the dangers of having software or data which is supposedly yours yet is de facto under direct control of an external 3rd party for whom you're nothing (i.e. not a mate you lent a CD to, but a big company with a massive Legal budget controlling your access to it using phone-home validation), so out of principle I heavilly favor sellers who do not try and retain control of what I bought from them. Same reason I didn't like "phone home" or "dependent on external servers" hardware or DRM-wrapped books or music, well before the recent wave of enshittification and increase in problems like digital books taken away from people because of some licensing dispute (or even their accounts just being terminated) or hardware bricked because the servers were switched off.
Whilst it might seem like an old-fashioned sense of ownership, that posture has saved me from pretty much all the effects of the enshittification wave.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(17 replies)
Wouldn't Steam, with TF2, be the most costumer oriented?
On being customer oriented on the other hand, Steam could use some improvement.
Akcthually you can publish drm free games on steam, it's just that you cannot download an installer. But for some games you can just copy the folder and it's going to work even without steam. Also GOG enforces drm free games
load more comments
(4 replies)
All those Counter Strike skins, too...
Meh, Proton alone makes me like Steam a bit more than GOG. Itch.io is also nice, but for some shitty reasons, they have some problems with my debit card. While it is nice to support small devs, I hate to support Peter Thiel the absolute piece of human garbage with my payment.
It's not official, but I'm liking Heroic Launcher. Really, GoG should just support them(or Lutris) and link to them directly for linux support.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Call me when GOG Galaxy supports Gnu/Linux.
Unofficial:
Minigalaxy and Heroic are both clients which support GoG
i mean you dont really need the launcher
And when GoG does regional pricing.
So much more expensive if you don't live in the US/Western Europe.
load more comments
(3 replies)
It's ironic that a platform hell bent on providing DMR-free games and preserving them doesn't seem interested in supporting the one OS in-line with their views.
I lament it, but I understand it. Last year's reports showed that GoG was barely staying afloat. Their rival shows Linux is only 3% of current market, so GoG probably doesn't want to spread themselves any thinner until they get some surplus cash to test the waters with.
Thank goodness for Heroic launcher.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Gog doesn't have lower prices for poorer regions. Paying 20-50% more for noDRM is no-no for me.
I love the idea of GoG, but it’s also the only client that forces me to pay in local currency with local taxes when I travel too. Have to use a VPN and change my time zone in settings to get it to let me pay in USD. Steam does it based on billing address and card.
I'm not trying to defend anyone here, though it might seem like that, but I'm not sure why valve is lumped in with this, especially since that's the steam logo.
Steam, as a platform, hasn't released much of anything, ever. Valve has been sitting mostly on the sidelines since half-life 2 episode 2 and HL:Alyx.
Steam itself is just a marketplace.
I get that a lot of publishers on steam will fall into the categories of games that are the subject of the meme, but I have a hard time piling steam with the games that are published on it.
And yes, corporations are not our friends, and all billionaires are bad billionaires, eat the rich and all that.... I'm just saying. There's a lot of bigger, much worse, fish to fry than gaben, valve, and steam in this discussion. That could have been EA's logo, or the Xbox logo (or ms game studios or whatever) or any number of massive publishers that are relevant here. Using the steam logo is lazy at best.
load more comments
(21 replies)
Costumer oriented
Opposite problem:
Reject consumerism, embrace FOSS.
I feel like GOG would be more popular if their client were better. Maybe more usable with a controller too?
And something that would help competition in the game launcher space in particular would be if OSes had great built-in controller support (and controller OS navigation) so we wouldn't have to rely on Steam for it.
What's the blue middle one? Don't recognize the icon.
Blizz's battle.net or whatever it's called nowadays.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Sadly I don't wear costumes, so I don't think GOG is for me.
/j
Old? I got Silksong from them on release day.
Their acronym is "Good Old Games", so I suspect it's a play on that.
They were Good Old Games for about 4 years until 2012, when they started selling modern games and rebranded to just GOG, dropping the whole "old games" moniker.
(Yeah, I'm also old. I was there when they rebranded, but I thought it was recently, around 2020!)
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'd love to play DRM games but I also love DRM free operating systems and apparently both at once is too much for the transphobes at CDPR to handle
An under-discussed topic is what will happen to Steam after Gaben crosses the rainbow bridge. It's practically begging to be enshittified.
With games I own, I never have to worry about this.
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›