this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
153 points (98.7% liked)

Android

20620 readers
155 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 113 points 6 days ago (5 children)

...made by developers with a special student/hobby account, only for a limited number of devices.

Half-assed "solution".

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 72 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, this is garbage. Nobody should accept this. People need to keep fighting this because the "hobbyist account" bullshit still gives Google full control over what apps you can install by creating an arbitrary restriction that they can change on a whim.

Nothing short of leaving the process of installing apps from outside the Play Store exactly the same as it is now should be accepted.

The Verge is laundering Google's Big Brother bullshit with their headline by making it sound like Google responded in an adequate manner, which is exactly what Google wants.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The headline matches the article. So if the Verge is wrong there, it's the entire article that's wrong, not just the headline.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The headline is incomplete to an extent that it's dishonest because it doesn't reflect the reality of what Google is saying.

Google will only allow "experienced users" to "continue" sideloading with the new, draconian restrictions that Google will be the arbiter of. "Continue" implies that sideloading will continue as it is in its currently acceptable form. However, that is not the case. If it were, Google would not be changing anything at all because there would be no perceived benefit for them doing so.

So in a way, yes, the entire article is wrong, because it doesn't adequately push back on the premise that it implies and instead uncritically parrots what Google would prefer people to believe, which is that people that want to sideload their apps and use third-party app stores like F-Droid will not be negatively impacted, which is not true.

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The company says it is now developing an “advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified.” This installation flow will include safeguards to protect people who are being coerced into installing a dangerous app, or tricked by a scammer, along with “clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved.”

Seems like there will also just be a toggle somewhere (probably developer settings) that lets someone install from any source

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago

The "install unknown apps" toggle already does that. Whatever that vague blurb implies, whatever the new toggle ends up being will be worse.

And that doesn't account for the need they're creating for a "student/hobbyist" account that Google is creating. If you use such an account, your app can only be installed on a limited number of devices, which Google will control.

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Where are you getting this from? The article makes it clear that the solution will be a settings-based solution similar to how it is today.

There's really no need to spread FUD over this, is there.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

It's not FUD. The "install unknown apps" toggle already does what you're describing. Whatever the intentionally vague blurbs from Google imply, whatever the new toggle ends up being will be worse.

And that doesn't account for the need they're creating for a "student/hobbyist" account that Google is creating. If you use such an account, your app can only be installed on a limited number of devices, which Google will control.

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Google has made an important concession. The company says it is now developing an "advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn't verified." This installation flow will include safeguards to protect people who are being coerced into installing a dangerous app, or tricked by a scammer, along with "clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved."

It's just going to be an evolution of the existing toggle, with a bit more scary language around it.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago

Again: Google would not be doing this if there was no perceived benefit for them. If it was merely a matter of adding a scarier warning, then what purpose does the new "student/hobbyist" account type that restricts the number of devices your app can be installed on serve??

[–] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

That's not what the article says at all. It is saying there will be a path to install unsigned apks, which by definition would not be attached to any developer account.

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

limited number of devices

Probably Pixels so they can keep spying anyway. This is better than nothing but still fucking awful.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're conflating two changes the article claims they're making. Do you have another source that you're basing this on?

This article outlines two changes:

  • a workflow for experienced users to install unverified apps, with safeguards in place to prevent scams
  • a new account type for students and hobbyists that doesn't require verification

This article is worded to make these two appear as individual changes, not the same change.

The company says it is now developing an “advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified.” This installation flow will include safeguards to protect people who are being coerced into installing a dangerous app, or tricked by a scammer, along with “clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved.”

Google is also working on a new developer account type for students and hobbyists, which won’t have to go through “full verification requirements,” but will only allow app installs on “a limited number of devices.”

Note the word "also" in the above quote.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 2 points 6 days ago

This should be higher

I think that's for Play Store accounts, so you can share an app there with a small audience without the otherwise necessary verification, not for installs from Github / F-Droid etc. which will have some new kind of "are you sure you're not getting scammed here?" confirmation for installing apps from completely unverified developers.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago (2 children)

“Keeping users safe on Android is our top priority,” Android president Sameer Samat wrote on X. “Scammers rely on anonymity to scale their attacks. Right now, if we block a bad app, they can often just create a new app and try again. Verification stops this “whack-a-mole” cycle by requiring a real identity – making it much harder and costlier to repeatedly distribute harmful apps.

So, you're actually going to put an effort in stopping people from publishing malware through the Play Store, right?

Right?

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 6 days ago

Good summary right there. Clean up your own house before you start preaching under the guise of user safety, fools.

So far the only "cleanup" I've seen in the Play Store is removing old apps that haven't been updated in a while but still run just fine, which means things like a physical Bluetooth air quality sensor I have needs the APK sideloaded now. Totally fighting scammers, Google. Totally.

Wouldn't it be great if these tech companies just dropped the verbal diarrhea filter and just spoke plainly?

"We're doing this to try and increase revenue by making ourselves a walled garden like Apple, because there isn't really competition anymore, we're greedy, and we lost the plot," is what they should be saying.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

worse… they'll happily sell ad space to any scammer

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember when Google backed off the changes to Chrome that prevented adblockers from working and a short time later implemented those changes anyway? Why TF would Google start caring about what users want now, especially since this issue is way less visible to most people? Google wants people to think they have a voice about what happens with Android, not to actually give them one.

Blocking side loading will force apps and any generated revenue into Google’s Play store which is exactly the point of this no matter what Google says.

The bloviating Google is doing now is irrelevant. The company will move forward with blocking side loading within the next few months, guaranteed.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Why TF would Google start caring about what users want now, especially since this issue is way less visible to most people?

EU Digital Markets Act. Google is already on the list. The watchdog is watching Google.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Bull shit half solution. Don't accept it.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 2 points 6 days ago

How is it only a half solution?

[–] traceur402@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 6 days ago

if you're so generous Google why have you moved to stand between me and my hardware?

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If they remove this then there's no reason to get an android

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Luckily early next year Valve releases a version of SteamOS that runs on a phone processor. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Steam Frame with Qualcomm SoC is just a first step for a phone several years down the road, kinda like a non-crap resurrection of the XPeria Play.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That would be amazing, but I'm not sure Valve are interested about phones

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In one of the interviews they said that Frame is only the first of several ARM devices in development. My guess is that some sort of Steam Deck Mini is likely to launch next but once the ARM Steam client is out, tinkerer at Valve also have more options.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Let's hope!

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago

Sounds like this only fixes the problem on the user's end. Developers are still getting screwed and many will stop maintaining their apps if they are forced to give their personal information to Google.

[–] Quexotic 2 points 4 days ago

So, on your phone, look in settings. Search for "feedback", select device feedback, and tell them directly.

Conversation is important but I'm guessing Google is not going to read this thread.

[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 0 points 4 days ago

The terrible thing to me is that the damage is done. I cannot stand hypocrisy and even if the backtrack slightly I will not be getting a new device from the one who pretends to not be the devil. I would rather get it from the devil himself.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 6 days ago

Damn some of y'all actually cannot read, huh?