this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
1162 points (98.9% liked)

linuxmemes

28044 readers
1103 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     

    I don't quite understand the criticism. It's not gonna be top of the line, but it's more than enough to replace my dying laptop from 2015 that I pretty much only ever use like a desktop anyway. And I can save myself the time and effort of picking parts, building, and dealing with shit not working as expected.

    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
    [–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

    Yeah, but we know that Linux people would cheer and praise those games if Linux support was suddenly added

    Exactly. Another lemming made a fantastic quip to this effect, claiming that consoles and windows are performing "SCP level containment" for the rest of us. Let them have CoD.

    [–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

    COD is going to beg to be let onto the Steam marketplace.

    And it's gonna be great.

    [–] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 33 points 22 hours ago

    You don't use Linux because of kernel anti-cheats

    I don't play CoD because kernel anti-cheats

    We are not the same

    [–] REDACTED 20 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    I genuinely do not understand the point of using kernel-level anticheats. They have been bypassed for nearly a decade now, you can buy cheats for any kernel-level anticheat game, battlefield 6 had hackers during the first betas, didn't even take more than a day to bypass it. The only thing they seem to be affecting is your player count and review ratings

    [–] Saryn@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

    Indeed. I chalk it up to the power of narratives and emotions. These are emotional decisions by managers who don't know what they're doing but salivate at the opportunity to limit someone's access to something for not paying them or for using something differently than how they'd like to after paying. You know, stupid s**t like kernel level anti cheat and denuvo.

    [–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

    But if the cheats are at kernel level, how can any anti cheat compete without going full server authoritative?

    [–] REDACTED 1 points 11 hours ago

    I'm actually a believer in server-sided anticheats. The time feels right to really start developing machine-learning backed anticheats that basically analyize how you play. Look up VAC Live

    [–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

    It's always the fucking suits.

    But then they only manage to make dissident movements bigger.

    [–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    In all honesty, I think it might be overall better if games like Fortnite, CoD or Fifa never get patched for Linux. The vast majority of their players are just addicts who fell victim to the predatory mechanisms. One of the few effective solutions is to cut them off this stuff.

    Ideally, these games shouldn't exist, at least not in their current form. But it's not like billionaire sociopaths will stop feeding on the weak and poor anytime soon.

    [–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

    The vast majority of their players are just addicts who fell victim to the predatory mechanisms.

    I don't play Fortnite, but the only players I know are kids, and they just play it because that's what everyone else is playing and they want to play with their friends. I'm not excusing the company for monetizing the shit out of it, but (anecdotally) the players' behaviour just reminds me of me and my friends playing Dooms, UTs, or Quakes back in the day.

    [–] DrWorm@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

    Let's not forget the whole Counter-Strike economy is based on gambling, which I think is also not good, especially because there's a lot of young kids picking that up and becoming gambling addicts, which I think is a net negative for people.

    Edit: People make games did a deep dive on this, as did Coffeezilla did a series on the whole ecosystem.

    [–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

    Oh wow I haven't played since the original Source. I thought you were just talking about how you had to manage an equipment budget in a match. But no, legit gambling scheme with real time and money for what amounts to NFTs that can only be used within Steam's ecosystem.

    [–] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

    Yeah, it's a bit of a black mark on valve however I imagine it prints a lot of money and they seem reticent to put an end to it.

    [–] conartistpanda@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Remember when Linux was about freedom? If the OS lets me delete root recursively, it can also let me play slop. It's not my mom.

    [–] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago

    Linux isn't stopping you from playing that slop, it's just to sloppy to work on Linux.

    [–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    That's the only thing I worry about personally, not the users so much, but the capitalists who see "opportunity" once Linux gains a hold, and start figuring out how to make it disgusting like everything else they touch with their greedy little slop mitts.

    It won't be "Well, Linux doesn't permit anticheat", it will be

    "Okay how do we create some centralized power structure that makes invasive DRM and anticheat that runs on Linux?"

    And they'll move to colonize.

    [–] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

    There are already anti cheat options on Linux. They just don't put any dev time into them because it's a small market currently.

    [–] Funky_Beak@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

    Embrace, Expand, Extinguish.

    [–] olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

    While I don't like these games either, I think it would be better for them to support Linux, so all users can enjoy the games they want.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

    Boycott the Call of Duty mines.

    [–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

    I am excited for the steam machine because of the anti cheat issue. If we push for linux gaming, they are forced to either find a ~~spyware~~ kernel anti cheat solution for linux or drop the ~~spyware~~ kernel anti cheat.

    [–] sleen@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

    This is the thing I agree with. This push will accelerate the advancement in gaming and other applications within computing. Compatibility will be priority across all types of hardware rather than restricted to corpoware. Additionally, efficiency would be increased rather than diminished with the pointless root access.

    Naive talk about about restricting games which most people find as favourite goes completely against the direction this scene should follow.

    load more comments (8 replies)

    You can literally install windows on it if you want

    [–] Meron35@lemmy.world 120 points 1 day ago
    [–] Darkness343@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

    They could sell it as a machine that protects your privacy and prevents any privacy invasive software from running in it

    [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    If it does not work on Linux I simply won't buy it.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

    I'm not sure that anyone who cares that much about COD has any level of overlap with PC gamers. Or really with any gamer, period. "Oh, no, I can't play the cod game this year. Womp womp." Said nobody over the age of 18, ever. They'll play the next one when it comes to steam machine. Lmao.

    Edit: key phrase "anyone that cares that much". Yes, everyone engages in hyperbole.

    [–] tehmics@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Lemmy users: no, it's everyone else who is out of touch

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    My friends that play CoD only really play CoD, a few are trying BF6. They never play any games with me because my games are uninteresting. My game selection of infinity minus 1 is considered uninteresting compared to their game selection of 1. You got the age all wrong though, they are 20 to 50.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] TheBannedLemming@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

    I am wondering, what are the most common multiplayer games that millenials gravitate towards? Are they playing more Battlefield, Marvel Rivals, and Apex Legends? Have so many of the industry titans like Call of Duty or Halo that they were raised on either shifted so much in direction and tone or threw corporate mismanagement driven themselves into the ground that they are no longer considered largely relevent to their demographic?

    [–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 140 points 2 days ago (8 children)

    been playing on linux for many many years.

    never once have I been stopped by kernal level anticheat.

    Weird, its almost as if good games don't use invasive spyware rootkits.

    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 1984@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    I will gladly give up a few games for running an amazing operating system instead of windows shit. :)

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 186 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

    I have to keep using the megacorporate OS because the other megacorporation won't let me play their slop game unless they can install a virus on my computer!

    [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 91 points 2 days ago (7 children)

    It's Activision-Blizzard. It's the same megacorporation

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] Danitos@reddthat.com 58 points 2 days ago
    [–] LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    The thing is this is a legitimate problem for the overall success of this. And the success of Linux as a general gaming OS. If people can't play their staples like CoD or fortnite or anything else with this problem, then that'll be enough to decide not to get this. Most people here probably don't care, but we're not the majority. And a lot of us probably aren't in the market for this anyway.

    [–] mlg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    This is the general sentiment I've been hearing, though surprisingly a lot of people belive that these games will eventually reach steam machine anyway because it seems stupid to them that it never happens.

    I didn't expect it, but a lot of Xbox players I know are considering saving up for the steam machine because it replaces their need for a console + PC for games, and they are aware that Xbox has been pretty open to putting their games on PC anyway. Some even considered Nintendo emulation which is defnitley something I didn't expect to see from Xbox only players.

    Halo Infinite and MCC run just fine on Linux. If they were comfortable letting their core IP on steam, it would be easy and probably beneficial for MSFT to do the same for CoD.

    I think the main holdout will be Epic Games, simply because they want to be a competitor to steam and they seem to hate the idea of giving valve any leverage in the gaming industry.

    [–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 69 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    I mean thats gonna be the joke. If steam machine really does take off, developers will come, just like they're starting to cater to the deck. It'll set a standard for what people want to play on and what they need to make sure their game works on. This is beyond anti cheat and DRM but it'll be interesting to see how the momentum picks up.

    I'd bet that Microsoft is already thinking about getting gamepass working on it (for better or worse)

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί