this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
219 points (97.8% liked)

World News

50919 readers
1759 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A survey published last week suggested 97% of respondents could not spot an AI-generated song. But there are some telltale signs - if you know where to look.

Here's a quick guide ...

  • No live performances or social media presence

  • 'A mashup of rock hits in a blender'

A song with a formulaic feel - sweet but without much substance or emotional weight - can be a sign of AI, says the musician and technology speaker, as well as vocals that feel breathless.

  • 'AI hasn't felt heartbreak yet'

"AI hasn't felt heartbreak yet... It knows patterns," he explains. "What makes music human is not just sound but the stories behind it."

  • Steps toward transparency

In January, the streaming platform Deezer launched an AI detection tool, followed this summer by a system which tags AI-generated music.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I was looking for videogame remixes one day and found a channel doing Little Nemo from the NES. I used to love that game and thought it was an odd pick for remixes, one you don't see too often so I clicked on it and ... it was incredibly underwhelming. I listened for a few minutes and something was kind of off but I couldn't quite put my finger on it. It was AI of course.

I'm not much of a music person, I've been listening to it daily for my entire life but I don't know much about theory. Still, when it comes to remixes, you can usually tell why someone remixed a song. They like that particular song, or there's a motif that really struck them. They'll pick out certain sounds or elements and build on them, single them out and rearrange them. It's very intentional and you can tell.

AI-generated remixes lack this intentionality. It was like someone had twisted a dial that just said "complexity" and that was it. There were more intricate layers of beats and instrumentation on top, but it wasn't doing anything. I sat there and listened for 15 minutes and it was like I heard nothing. Nothing new stuck in my head, there was no riff or little melody that made go, "Aw fuck yeah! This is what it's about!"

That's how you can tell AI generated music.

Sadly, a lot of slower and minimalist genres have been decimated by it though. Vaporwave, chillcore, dungeonsynth. A lot of these had large bodies of work to train on and it's a lot harder to tell due to their subtler nature, but you'll usually notice the artist has a new hour-long upload every day. If you click through it at random, you'll begin to notice that while the tones shift, the overall pattern of the entire hour-long mix is still kind of the same?

It's bleak, man. Fuck that shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Okay okay. First off, fuck AI yeah. But if it's becoming this indistinguishable where you need to go looking for tells that it's AI I don't think it's fair to call it bad music, just how it got there is bad.

It's like listening to Kanye West. Graduation is amazing but fuck him.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Hard disagree, because it's like with all the other forms of AI-created slop - with the real thing there's layers of meaning, and you spend time and mental energy digging into that and getting something from it. But as with AI art and AI prose, you try looking closer at it and it just makes you feel hollow and frustrated at having wasted your time.

There was no meaning, there was no symbolism, there were no clever literary allusions, there was no interplay between the melody and the lyrics, it's just superficial garbage that tricks you into giving it attention by sounding good on its first listen.

(Edit: lol touched a nerve with some shit talentless musicians)

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I listened to Kanye for years before he publicly became a Nazi and I don't think the breadth of his mind changed overnight.

I spent years defending his off-putting public personality because his music touched me from the start.

I really think our pattern seeking monkey brains are easily tricked enough to find meaning in a pile of garbage if we believe hard enough and AI represents this, not proves against it.

[–] AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Do you think AI music or art is just people putting random words into a prompt to get an output? AI music still allows people to feed their own lyrics into the output so there can still be plenty of layers to the lyrics, people refine the beats and rhythms to match what they are feeling so emotion still comes through. People who make good AI art use it as a base and mash it up, refine prompts and find what matches what they feel, they are just using a different brush than people in the past. It also allows more people to participate in art than we have had in the past, aside from the environmental impacts of AI which are a problem, use of AI in art is just another tool for expression. Its good which means even the slop ends uo looking and sounding better than the non ai slop counterparts but that doesnt detract from the fact people put emotion and thought into making good art even if they incorporate AI into their workflow to do so.

[–] MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If you compare AI 'slop' with great works of course its easy to dismiss it and bash it. But there is more human crap out there made each day than there is great works. Music, images, video, texts, all of it. For each piece of great work there is that you find, theres hundreds if not thousands of not so great works that are out there. AI works can be anything from 100% no human involvment besides the initial prompt. They can also involve time and work to get the prompt just the way the user wants. It's going to end up with more people being able to create more things. Not everyone can draw, or play music, or make movies. Not everyone has the time or money to put everything together thats needed to make something like a good song or a good movie. AI tools are going to give more people those chances, and yes there is going to be slop, but theres already been slop for decades that was all 100% human being made, that had no meaning, no symbolism, no clever literay allusions. So what exactly is the problem with people using AI generate something?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 37 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I fell hard for Dysmn, who was suspiciously dropping new music every few days. I really liked the sound, and I haven't found anything that sounds like that since. 270+ videos in under 2 years. I realized it wasn't human after a month or two.

Soooo, if anybody knows a great jazzy EDM metal noise, let me know.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I looked that up, and it actually slaps. Not really my genre, but I can see how people would assume it’s real people.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (29 children)

Humans are primarily visual creatures, so we can detect the slop in AI images a LOT faster than we can in audio.

Human artists are going to have to get a lot weirder to out-innovate AI music, and I’m actually happy about that. Weird music is the best.

load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] remote_control_conor@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't listen to anything made after about 2010. I don't have these worries.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I only watch YouTube videos from pre 2010. You probably wouldn't know them.

[–] tym@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They were produced in Canada, after all

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I have yet to hear an AI generated song that didn't have some obvious tells in the vocals. Like how you can hear autotune, but it's even worse than autotune. Crackly/crunchy, heavily distorted but only on certain words. Weird pronunciation or annunciation.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

You have yet to notice an AI-generated song that didn't have some obvious tells.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I don't know if people are still making sampled music, but this thought occurred to me the other day.

What if I prompted certain phrased, riffs, and hooks that never existed instead of making a complete song.

Then I made a song using samples in my work.

Is this a new song? AI? A mix? Seems plausible that someone is doing this now.

I pretty much only listen to live music anymore anyways, because everything else is so produced it might as well be AI.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (11 children)

The drummer sounds like he has to many arms.
And the guitarist and the keyboard players sound like they clearly have more than 5 fingers on each hand. 😋

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 40 points 2 days ago

every progressive genre wants to speak with you.

Drummers very often sound like they have too many arms. Multiple percussion tracks can be layered, and also, that's kind of the point of trickier drum beats.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's ridiculous! Drummers can't have too many arms!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago

So Phil Collins and Mike Rutherford? /s

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 days ago

This description of AI songs could be a lament about most pop music: formulaic, sweet, generic, produced in a studio to sound perfect, not human. Works on radio or Spotify, but not so much for a live audience.

Sure, that's hard to detect. AI reproduces what we've been exposed to for decades.

[–] benignintervention@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I've been trying to figure out if Stone Rebel is an AI band or not. They started in 2018 and have put out something like 77 albums since, but it's relatively simple instrumental. They have almost no information online except a claim that they're "based in France"

Honestly can't tell if they're a legit yet very private group, or if they were early adopters of procgen music

all the album art is ai and there's no mention of them touring or anything. Bandcamp also allows ai artists, and that's where I found their album art

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm in the camp of, "if it's good, why should I care?" However, I'm all for transparency! Passing off AI-generated music as human-generated is fraud. Be honest!

There's a LOT of grey areas though. If you're a vocalist and you're using an AI-generated background? How's that any different from pressing "play" on a sequencer or even an audio file (of some sequenced or drum track)?

If you're a lyricist, the actual music isn't as important as the lyrics. Does it matter if they used AI to generate the music or should every lyricist be forced to pay someone to make the music for them or master an instrument (or sequencer)?

What if you're trying to translate your music into a different language and use AI to translate it? Is that AI-generated music? You can give your whole damned song to AI and it'll convert to a different language in-place without having to re-record it. It even uses your singer's voice!

To me, it's incredible technology and it's enabling artists of all kinds to do cool things with their music. It seems rather paternalistic to suggest someone's creativity doesn't "count" if they didn't sweat or spend years practicing to create it.

[–] InevitableWaffles@midwest.social 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You must consider that the AI "helping" the artist is built from the stolen work of countless artists. Regardless of use case, the tool only exists due to theft. Plus, this tool exists as a way to not pay talent for content.

Since the bread and circuses machine must keep dispensing to keep the masses anaesthetized, the elites need a way to cut the costs or they will lose points are their net worth scorecard and get made fun of by the other billionaires.

Not to mention, AI is a shortcut that does not generate skills besides prompt engineering. We have research proving this with students and the labor force losing reasoning and straight memory by handing off to "AI". Part of being a musician is the effort and practice and knowing an instrument. Asking the clanker for a tune because learning takes too long or is too difficult goes along with what the article says for detecting it. The work will be emotionless and have no soul. Musicians are allowed to make choices for their music, of course. AI rounding out an artist's tools is what it is. I view the tool as a corrupting force but, it's their perogative. But people without no knowledge or skill for making music cranking out these generic sounding similacra to make money is always going to set my teeth on edge.

Edit: spelling and tense correction. Revision and expansion of idea to express less derision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

If AI removes the skill and expertise required to perform a task, it’s fucking trash

If a vocalist can’t play music, they should find people that can, and work with them. If they use AI, they’re are trash.

[–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

I use Qobuz, but is Spotify the only service that shamelessly promotes ai music?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›