this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
781 points (98.3% liked)

Fediverse memes

2353 readers
311 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
Specific
  1. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

Clearly not radicalized enough if he is willing to let the rich live to be taxed

[–] dreary8154@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why did the kid become a liberal commie just by joining the fediverse.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

It's either that or complain about all the liberal commies here.

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 110 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pst. Hey kid wanna try some Linux distros!?

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve got some real nice Gentoo.  You’ll be compiling for days.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jeez, you can't just go straight for the hard stuff like that! You gotta ease into it with some Bazzite or somethin' first.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 5 days ago

Arch or nothing.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

"tax the rich" is a scam?

The wealth tax typically proposed by these campaigns (like 2 or 3%) would raise money but it would not stop billionaires from getting richer. (That's why even billionaires advocate for it.)

The finish line should not be "raise money to fund public programs."

The finish line should be "billionaires don't exist."

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good, don't let good be the enemy of okay, and don't let okay be the enemy of "not as bad as it could be"

Because it's starting to get as bad as it can be.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

Support everything that is an improvement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

There literally should just be a cap. Make it something ridiculous like "billionaires are not allowed to exist, so everything you earn past $999,999,999.99 is public property" and I don't see any way how someone could disagree with this other than wanting to be a malicious parasite. That is more than enough money to buy a yacht for your yacht and is also an amount of money that cannot be legitimately obtained.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where's the gay flag? The programming socks? The kitty ears? Smdh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

is that kid even wearing any beans?

it's like the artist wasn't even trying to capture our essence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As someone that won't drive a car and will not encourage big oil or big car, I'm also delightfully surprised by the somewhat strong presence of "fuck cars" communities on the fediverse, and I can only approve.

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

the fediverse's stance is "fuck everything about this"

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

Fuck consumerism.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago

funny what happens when you have a system without profit motive so people mostly just talk to other people

It does probably help that the general spread includes people who like cars but absolutely hate modern cars and the near ubiquity of them. What I wouldn't do to fire but a single Davey Crockett payload directly at GMs HQ.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fake. There is no arch symbol.

[–] Roulette@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andyburke@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago

Pretty much how it works.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Half of these don't apply to me. I'm not necessarily anti AI, pro Palestine, or a leftist. While the fediverse is ultimately dominated by specific groups, it's still more diverse than we give it credit for.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I don't agree with you, but glad your here regardless friend

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You're not necessarily pro-Palestine? So you're not necessarily anti-Genocide?

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These aren't the same thing...

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com -3 points 6 days ago

Explain how "I'm not in favour of the people suffering genocide" is not the same as "I'm against genocide".

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You can be against what Israel is doing without specifically being in support of Palestine. But it's harder to explain with a short pro/anti type label.

Palestine is a country and its possible to have a very different feeling to a government and the people.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So the ongoing genocide and the 50 year long siege that Palestinians have been subjected to has no effect on their government or their people? I'd love to see what ideals and morals you support when you spend 50 years under siege.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You clearly don't care to even try and understand, so I am not going to bother anymore.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com -1 points 5 days ago

No, I don't care to understand genocide bothsiders

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›