Many of the reaction posts are cut from a longer stream. So viewers have built one-way relationships with creators and thus "spend time" with them. The reactions were born out of that.
No Stupid Questions
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
Because if you show the original video, thats copyright infringement, and pirating of content.
Show the "reaction", and it falls within fair use. Even if the reactor doesn't DO anything.
I mean that's what these people are trying to do and claiming to do, but under most jurisdictions this doesn't hold in court
And that's exactly why YouTube channel H3H3productions is suing some Twitch streamers that just reposted his content with no commentary whatsoever (some of the those streamers even went to the bathroom during their "reaction").
It’s funny how they won a lawsuit over the same thing back in the day and we were all on their side, but now they’re rabid Zionists who lie about everyone else and their critiques of them and spending the last of their money to mount lawsuits against small, often women, creators who they know don’t have money to fight back.
Fuck H3.
Show the “reaction”, and it falls within fair use
i doubt that, but it would probably depend on jurisdiction.
i think it is just really lazy way how to become a youtuber. you only need to be attractive person with no other skill.
Laughing is a social thing that people don't normally do by themselves (unless it's really funny), so I''m guessing that having a human face on screen to "enjoy the content with" ups the level of engagement. Similar to laugh tracks in shitty sitcoms.
Interesting.. Never thought of that
It's a way of stealing someone else's content and for some reason YouTube allows it. I close that slop immediately.
Same. I do the ‘show less of this shit’ also.
Do you count debunking videos as stealing, because I don't. Some of the best videos is people debunking misinformation posted by assholes like Rogan.
Wtb are you talking about? This is not even int he same topic as the comment you replied to.
Not always. I've seen clips of reaction videos where people are shown older media that's typically unfamiliar to young people. In that case, it's a way to reassure older people of the continued appeal of the pop culture of their youth. Something like a modern high schooler listening to Led Zeppelin for the first time.
Billions of idiots. I have no other explanation.
I've seen limited evidence to suggest the audience is material. A lot of these numbers are farmed for engagement and to inflate ad revenue. A lot are just channels that auto play when people aren't paying attention.
There's definitely an audience of little kids who are just strapped to pads with nothing better to do. But it can't be overstated how fudged these audience numbers can get.
YouTube claims their Shorts channel gets 200 billion views per day. There's only 5 billion Internet users on Earth.
That's 2.5B with 80 views a day, or 1.25 with 160 a day. Sadly those numbers aren't that unbelievable the way people consume short media. Just average it out so some make up for others only watching a few.
Reaction videos just feel like a cheap way to profit on other people's content without getting flagged.
Unpopular thing to say but... I just don't understand watching other people gaming.
Note that I did not say "people who watch twitch are idiots".
Just that I personally don't get it, never will. I'm fine with that too, people do loads of things that I don't find at all appealing.
For the same reason people watch professional sports.
Fair enough. I don't watch ~~gambling ads~~ professional sports either.
I'm not into sports neither and when my father explained why he watches sports, I suggested you might just as well watch people playing video games.
I thought that was ridiculous at the time but it actually became a thing
i watch it for the commentary. Its also kind of like pseudoshared experience. There are also bunch of games that are not necessarily bad but which i dont want to buy, so watching someone else play it is nice way to experience the game and also see if it would be worth getting afterall.
The streamer might do some funny (or insightful) comments about the game while playing, or do a playthrough with some weird conditions (e.g. he can't do certain actions like healing, ...) that you wouldn't in your right mind apply to yourself
Sometimes I find it fun to watch a game I will never play, but I also get to chat with the streamer so theres that too.
I agree it is generally pretty stupid and difficult to watch, however there are a few situations where it makes some sort of sense.
- It is sometimes used as a way to get around certain copyright issues (probably not legally, but it sometimes confounds the horribly stupid copyright bots that major platforms use with lazy impunity)
- Sometimes the person "reacting" is themselves entertaining to watch. These reaction videos are generally for pre-existing fans of that person, not for fans of the video being watched.
- Sometimes the person reacting is adding genuine value, for example they might be a legitimate expert (or at least a self-believed one) on the topic the video is discussing. This is in some sense sort of a video review, or a fact-check.
- It is pure algorithm-bait, not really intended for any actual human to deliberately enjoy, but it tricks the algorithm into showing it to people who are too low-effort to look up the real video and just watch it because it's in their "feed".
Usually it's some combination of the above.
Yeah I don't like them either.
You know that person reacting already watched it at least twice before putting on a show of exaggerated expressions.
It just seems dumb to me.
It’s ridiculous. I can’t even figure out a stupid reason to do it.
I don't understand those long ass unboxing videos either. If you wanna review a product and show us what all came with it. Have that shit all laid out on a table before you start the video.
It's weird to make a 10 min video of slowly cutting tape and meticulously removing things from a shipping container.
Weird.
as I literally watch such a video
I'm there for the added layer of humor provided by the "reactor." Like GameGrumps. I am not watching them play games to see them play games; they actually kinda suck at most games and its frustrating seeing them unable to solve easy puzzles or win easy fights. But they are funny as fuck.
Ok. I'll throw myself on my sword and give a different take than what most people are.
I wasnt into reaction videos aka analysis vidoes at all until Kpop Demon Hunters came out. I really like this movie. I've even watched it several times, including once at the theater, which is very unusual for me.
I have a fairly isolated life. Not many friends and the few I do have I only see occasionally. So I don't have anyone I can gush about this movie to let alone rewatch it with or introduce it to.
Putting on a reaction video while walking the dogs lets me listen to someone else enjoying discovering the movie for the first time. Obviously I can't participate, but I've still shared their joy.
An alternate one is singers analyzing music videos. I watched someone going nut over a Beatbox video of Beatpella House, then saw their reaction video of VoicePlay covering Nothing Else Matters. Mindblowing rendition! I would never have found this without scrolling through their other videos. Sometimes being open to new things pays off.
Again- I’m not talking about analysis videos.
I’m talking about videos where a useless pile of flesh takes up half the screen, nodding along, or laughing while saying nothing at all.
Its affirmation therapy for insecure people. "Somebody likes the thing I like!"
It’s the easiest/laziest way to get a ton of views/engagement. Why bother doing the work of creating your own content when you can just steal other people’s videos and put your face in the corner “reacting” to it, then publish it as your own? Get enough subscribers/followers and views and you can start monetizing it.
I can understand that many people find reaction videos useless and low-effort content. Personally, I enjoy rewatching a lot of shows and it adds to my enjoyment doing so with somebody else. I have nobody in my life who is interested in that, so reaction videos work as a parasocial substitute. I can still see people I like (as little as I really know them) sharing the experience and sometimes having interestingly different reactions and observations.
BTW: For those who think reaction videos are a sensible way to not pay for the original content, may I introduce you to BitTorrent?
There is some content I am curious about but can only stomach when I watch it on a reaction channel so I don't die of second hand embarrassment. For other people I think it has a lot to do with feeling lonely. Reaction channels make you feel like you have someone to share the jokes with. I think way too many people are lonely nowadays.
I think it’s one of the most lazy ways to make a video, and leeching off more popular content.
They are not transforming the content enough to be free use.
As a counterpoint, I like watching The Charismatic Voice - a trained opera singer reacting to pop and rock music vocalists, often the first time hearing them, and offering a great analysis of their vocal techniques. That's a reaction video done right.
As an example, watching her react to John Farnham's performance of 'Help' reduces me to tears.
The last time someone made a similar complaint about reaction videos, I responded with a comment similar to yours regarding El Estepario Siberiano reacting to a Danny Carey performance and someone else responded to me explaining that an analysis video is much different than a reaction video and I tend to agree. I appreciate analysis videos where the person provides insight and context to what they're showing me that I might not understand on my own.
often the first time hearing them
If there's a bigger lie told by react videos than this, I'd like to hear it.
That's literally all Japanese shows. Sometimes they several reaction faces simultaneously.
I don't know but I'm thankful I don't see any of that shit pitched to me yet.
Idiots seem to determine what gets popular on YouTube and that happened to be one of them for a good while.
oh I have seen that!! and wondered the same. For anyone confused, it's (what I assume to be) somebody else's recording, with a head superimposed on it that chuckles every 10s or so
I’d say let’s start reaction to reaction videos, but Bo Burnham already covered that ground
Cannot stand reaction videos. We’re on the same page.