this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
158 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

41172 readers
457 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

France seeks to ID everyone using social media.

[–] silentdon@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago

I am fine with children not having access to social media but not at the cost of my privacy. If they could implement it without requiring me to submitted any identifying info just to watch some reels, then I'd be all for it.

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Yea like as much as I'm concerned about government control etc... Social media is actively doing irreversible harm and needs to be treated like digital cocaine it is.

[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 1 week ago (68 children)

*France seeks to implement mass surveillance online by requesting age verification, but politicians wrap it in "we do it to protect the children" which is bullshit.

Protect your rights to privacy, stand up against such erosion of your rights.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"Protect children" bills never protect children

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Sex offender registry?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (67 replies)
[–] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Whenever this comes up, it feels like a play to harvest people's data and / or to slip additional laws into place under the guise of "protect the children".

On one hand I don't think it's terrible to try to guide kids more. I think parents should be doing more parenting tbh. If a parent wants to put parental locks in place, they can. Even blocking specific sites from being accessed entirely. I think the bigger issue is people don't understand how to use computers so they think there's nothing they can do lol.

On the other I think it runs the risk of preventing kids from accessing information online, finding safe spaces online, and isolating kids more than they already can be. It also limits things like teaching kids about technology and how to use it safely.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If headlines were honest: France seeks to prohibit early teenagers from social interaction with peers unless they are good at doing it offline.

If I hadn't had the Internet in the years before my 15th birthday, this would in my retrospective opinion have amounted to near torture.

Can we finally get politicians who grew up with the Internet into power? How many more years must people the age of Macron be allowed to make these kinds of decisions? 😟😡

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Wouldn't this just wind up being a de facto ban on the platform we're using right now? How could Lemmy implement an age verification system? If social media platforms that dont comply with age verification are banned, then by default there goes most of the fediverse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›