this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
32 points (94.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

45186 readers
932 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 72 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Both sides were the aggressors in general and each side had moments where they were the more active part leading to confrontations.

I don't think the cold war can be described as one single conflict with a clear aggressor, which is the whole point why it is called a cold war.

I'm not knowledgeable enough if there are statistics about which side was more in the wrong or did more aggressor stuff.

But for me, knowing that the USA did the Iran and CIA stuff while the USSR did Afghanistan and KGB stuff is enough for me to decide both were elitist assholes that didn't care for normal humans but just wanted to increase their own power.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But for me, knowing that the USA did the Iran and CIA stuff while the USSR did Afghanistan and KGB stuff is enough for me to decide both were elitist assholes that didn’t care for normal humans but just wanted to increase their own power.

That's actually a pretty solid take from what I know about it. Both powers were being total assholes and wanted control over as much of the world as they could get. USA had strong weapons power but USSR had strong soft power, bringing social programs to people who desperately needed them. Roads and bridges and such.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The soft power of the USSR:

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't that what they did if you didn't want their soft power?

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Believe it or not, these were invited by a certain asshole sitting in the government at the time. I can only assume this is how the friendly visit looked like back in the day. Different time, different customs...

[–] db2@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago
[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

It depended on where in the world you were. Both Russia and America wanted to avoid full on conflict so they established proxy wars to try weaken the other. America was certainly the aggressor in Vietnam and Korea while Russia was the aggressor in Cuba and arguably in Afghanistan amongst a whole myriad of other conflicts

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 10 points 6 days ago

I mean Cuba was a crisis and dangerous for sure, and the USSR pushed it to the near breaking point, but I still find it funny that the USA got nervous when strategic rockets were close to them, something that was true for Moscow nearly the whole time.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

while Russia was the aggressor in Cuba and arguably in Afghanistan

Fucking pardon me? Russia literally tried to take over Afghanistan after the US gave them weapons to protect them from Russia.

"We are not afraid of the Russians, but we are afraid of their helicopters."

-- Some Afghani

edit: I'd say that the USSR wasn't really the aggressor in Cuba, that was Fidel and his cohort. Castro literally reached out to the Soviets because he needed help after his revolution.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 6 days ago

Nobody? That's why it was a cold war.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

Both the U.S. and the Soviets supported countless proxy wars across Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and the Carribean, with weapons, training, manpower, and a lot of propaganda. So many small conflicts were blown up to huge ones by massive amounts of funding and support from the two nuclear superpowers. They both had numerous spy operations involving the CIA and KGB respectively. Both sides were aggressive, there was no side that was not.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nobody that's why it was cold. Both sides were ramping up and preparing for the other to attack. They engaged in proxy wars and demonstrations of their power and capabilities. But the cost of attacking was everything and neither was willing to sacrifice life on earth without being attacked first.

[–] pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 6 days ago

Well if Russia is adamant on using their nuclear missles by moving them to Belarus, that's a telling sign as to who we know that would strike first. That's the dangers of dictatorship in control of a country.

No country should have nukes and I think we should destroy all and any documents, research regarding nuclear development. It's done nothing but make everyone fear for their lives and definitely leave everlasting impact.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Two powers wanted to build a politically favorable buffer zone, but it was the same buffer zone.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The belligerents in a cold war are limited to being passive aggressive.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago

Neither and both. They both wanted their world view to dominate and did so by influencing a bunch of countries. The US fucked up all of South America during that time, Afghanistan, Iran, Vietnam, Korea, and probably a few countries in Africa. The Soviet Union wasn't innocent in all of this fighting their proxy wars against the US.

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today -1 points 6 days ago

In order to know who the aggressor in this contrived war was, look at the money that flowed to both sides of the war. You won't like the answer otherwise.