“frustrated with dysfunctional Congress”
Is that really the reason though? Maybe the outlet repeating this talking point should dig a little deeper.
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
156 points (98.1% liked)
politics
26998 readers
2235 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It also mentioned the demanding schedule where they need to work for like three months every year.
Poor things had a 43 day vacation right after Summer vacation, grueling.
Bastards take vacations like hobbits take meals.
That's a bit unfair to House Reps, who do actually spend an enormous amount of their "off-time" running from plutocrat to plutocrat begging for more money to finance the next election cycle. Fundraising is the primary job of the average House Rep, with legislating coming well behind.
If they find a sweet gig on the Wingnut Welfare gravy train, they might have to work even less.
I wonder how many are leaving for the death threats they are facing or will possibly face if they go against Taco and how many are leaving so they can set up a nice comfortable grift on the Wingnut Welfare gravy train because they don't think they will get re-elected?
Or some combination of the two motivations?
I doubt very many, if any at all, are doing it for principle or frustration at not being able to govern in a sane way.
When two teams show up to play a game of football and one team insists on picking up the ball and running with it, knocking over any opponent who gets in their way — yeah, it’s going to be dysfunctional. Not the game’s fault though, just that the two sides aren’t using the same rule book.
When two teams show up to play a game of football and one team insists on picking up the ball and running with it, knocking over any opponent who gets in their way
Republicans out here playing full contact football. Democrats still insisting we're playing bad mitton.
But don't worry, I'm sure 2026 will break for the liberal party and we can go back to our Pelosi-Era Rules Based National Order. Funding the fascist policies of Red States and dismantling the public institutions in Blue States through the legal and respectable mechanisms of budget showdowns and J6 riots.
Not the game’s fault though
The system is what it does. If your opponent starts hitting you in the face with the controller until you give them your console and all the money in your wallet, screaming "that's not how you play!" doesn't win you any extra points.
Time for the other team to bring firearms.
LOL they have a majority.
TheHill is a digital magazine of, by, and for Congresscritters.
Talk about a massive target audience.
More that they're too chickenshit to get rid of Mike Johnson. Like 2 Republicans could join with Dems and replace Johnson with a speaker that cared about protecting the constitutional role of the Legislature
They see the internal polling and couldn't be bothered campaigning to lose. So they'll take their money and run.
replace Johnson with a speaker that cares about protecting the constitutional role of the Legislature
I don’t suppose you have a name in the Republican Party that would do that?
It’s like they’re SO CLOSE to realizing that THEY are the problem.
Don't get too excited, they'll still blame democrats every chance they get.
I doubt too many Republicans have really grokked that the Republican Party is full of Republicans yet.
But... you are Congress. 😖
They are the dysfunction
The snowflake does not blame itself for the avalanche.
Also works for traffic: you are traffic.
Reminds me of a game of DotAge where I only had 10 villagers (going for an achievement) and five of them went on strike. Like, dudes. Whatever you want, you're the ones who aren't giving it to yourselves.
They got their government healthcare and pension
They finished their market pump n dumps
They secured a flotation device and are now sprinting for the life boats after crashing the titanic
Exactly. This is not a crisis of conscience or anything like it. They got what they wanted and now they're fucking off to their feathered nests.
Dysfunctional? They waved through, covered for or actively cheerled one piece of crap after the other, selling out their own power while they were at it. Call that dysfunctional!
They're probably more frustrated that Trump didn't deliver on the promises of wealth and power he made them.
See folks? The GOP isn't the cause of this cluster fuck of a situation. They are just as frustrated as you. The GOP is sympathetic. You like the GOP. They are on your side.
/s
This is intentional though. That's how trump purges anyone who might thinking of resisting.
Its kinda wild that congress has gotten so toxic that Republicans are sort of term limiting themselves to deal. Like who would have guessed that there was a limit to the stupid where they would eventually do the right thing for the wrong reasons?
Sorry, GOP know how to run a country.... into the ground. My bad.
Self-awareness isn't their strongest quality, is it?
The number of lawmakers not seeking reelection for their seat this cycle — 30 Republicans and 23 Democrats, according to a Ballotpedia tracker updated Dec. 23 — has drawn comparisons to the 2018 midterms, when 37 Republican lawmakers departed, compared to just 18 Democrats, and Democrats saw a blue wave of wins.
People always leave a winning team, right?