Linguistics

1768 readers

50 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laypeople to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

Instance rules apply.
Be reasonable, constructive, and conductive to discussion.
Stay on-topic, specially for more divisive subjects. And avoid unnecessary mentioning topics and individuals prone to derail the discussion.
Post sources when reasonable to do so. And when sharing links to paywalled content, provide either a short summary of the content or a freely accessible archive link.
Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
Have fun!

Related communities:

Resources:

Grammar Watch - contains descriptions of the grammars of multiple languages, from the whole world.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lvxferre@mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyz

Most Spoken Languages (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 week ago by noumenon@lemmy.world to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Converting that top 10 from the first pictures into percentages of the world population:

1996: 2.6/5.8 = 45%
2025: 3.1/8.2 = 38%

This decrease from 45% to 38% is actually good news, in my opinion. It means higher language diversity.

For the second picture, the interesting part is to contrast it with the first one:

the L1 English speaking community is less than a half the L1 Mandarin one, but the former has a considerably larger non-native speaking community
Hindi 345m vs. 609m might look like a surprise, but it's actually understandable, given the linguistic landscape of India. I expect most L2+ Hindi speakers to speak natively another language from India, too.

Picture #3 is interesting for potential diversity hotspots, but it should be taken with a grain of salt. Deciding what counts as a separated language is surprisingly hard; specially when language continua are involved. Also, it's understandably biased towards countries that control larger populations.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What would be a better measure for picture three? Language Per Capita? Languages Spoken By At Least X% Of The Population?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think languages per capita (or "languages per 10 000 inhabitants") would be already better, and a low-hanging fruit.

A more invested option would be to disregard countries, split the world into ~200 geographical areas with ~40M inhabitants each, and then count the languages in each of those areas. This would be specially useful because, in large countries, most of the linguistic diversity is clustered into a few regions.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago

That's a much better proposal actually. Would also make especially good sense for regions of Africa, where country lines have very little to do with the distribution of languages for the most part.

[–] LasseKB@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

What's with the drop in German L1 speakers? If I'm understanding the first image correctly, the number went from 98m to less than 86m