this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
294 points (99.7% liked)

politics

26998 readers
2306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Billionaires are raking in staggering profits off the backs of ordinary workers,” said Chuck Collins of the Institute for Policy Studies.

The collective wealth of US billionaires surged to $8.1 trillion in 2025 as working-class Americans faced a cost-of-living crisis made worse by President Donald Trump’s tariff regime and unprecedented assault on the social safety net.

An analysis released Friday by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) found that the top 15 US billionaires saw the largest wealth gains last year, with their collective fortune growing from $2.4 trillion to $3.2 trillion. That 33% gain was more than double the S&P 500’s 16% increase in 2025.

What IPS describes as the “elite group” of US billionaires includes Tesla CEO Elon Musk, the richest man in the world; Google co-founder Larry Page; Amazon founder Jeff Bezos; and Oracle executive chairman Larry Ellison.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 46 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Just a bit more wealth at the top. Gonna trickle down any day, now guys. No way they’d just hoard it as a measuring contest. No one is that juvenile, right?

[–] infectoid@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think this is less of a water in the dam situation and more of a candy in the piñata situation.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A whole lot trickles down once you kneecap 'em.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kneecapping them would be unlikely to bleed them, I propose hanging and spearing them. Also I want to do at least one human sacrifice.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Crueler to keep them alive and make an example out of them. The kneecapping is just to "clip their wings", slow them down, and give them some pain they cant forget.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It used to be the excuse for qualitative easing that they'd invest it rather than spend it ("the velocity of money") but now they have robot armies, space programs, and AI data centers to blow the money on.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Some will trickle down alright, 10% trickle up and 1% trickle down. Be happy with your 1%.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So in other words... Billionares have become trillionares and the rest of us are... the same... which is really less off....

[–] August27th@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

The way accounting works, if the money is going on to their books, it had to come off of someone else's. So the rest of us are not the same, you are correct, we are actually poorer, collectively.

Billionaires' accumulation of wealth is basically self perpetuating once they get to the point of being a billionaire. They can't possibly spend it all, so they invest anything left over, which gains more profits, which they invest again and so on.

They eventually run out of regular investments to invest in (see stocks just going up and up), so they move into investing in things like housing, which is why that bubble refuses to burst. Meanwhile, you can't afford to buy your own house because of the astronomical cost, and you're left renting your housing from the billionaire class who effectively own it, creating more profit for them. Even if you buy a home, you likely have a mortgage, with that money having been lent by... investors (see above), creating more profit for them.

Unfortunately, every dollar lent for anything requires an interest payment, which, if you know how that works (see "fractional reserve banking" to get an idea), forces money to be printed in order for there to be enough money supply to keep the whole system working. Printing money causes inflation, which lowers the buying power of any money you do have.

For regular people, that means we're collectively poorer.

For billionaires, they'd never notice the inflation, both because they already have more money than they could ever spend, and the growth is self perpetuating because they have no other way to spend it.

If you follow that out, obviously they'll end up owning absolutely everything.

But people have to eat, so one day, shit is going to hit the fan. The longer taxing billionaires heavily is delayed, the larger that shit storm is going to be. The people who are right now living in shantytowns, in their cars or RVs, are the tip of the iceberg.

--

This doesn't even touch on things like shrinkflation (which is just another part of general inflation).

Some people might say "oh, fractional reserve banking is dead", but what they don't say is that the reserve part is dead, meaning the engine is now fully pinned instead of just red-lining.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The rest of us are the same?

The same as when? It'd be nice if for the rest of us it would be the same as a few decades ago, where the working class was still able to live comfortably.

It's not the same, the rich didn't become richer of their own merit. They squeezed and squeezed and squeezed the working class to make thei billions, while the poor get poorer and poorer and poorer.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It’s not the same, the rich didn’t become richer of their own merit. They squeezed and squeezed and squeezed the working class to make thei billions, while the poor get poorer and poorer and poorer.

Well, that's kind of what I meant by the last part but you can get the credit.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Imagine what the US could do if half the populace weren't morons that defend billionaires, while those same billionaires take shits into their cereal.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Ther hungry masses must be fed...the rich

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Exactly as designed by the fucking rich