this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
370 points (98.2% liked)

memes

18832 readers
2507 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Consent-o-matic allows me to access the contents without accepting your policies. Win for me

[–] Syndication@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not sure if what I use is better, but I just use the optional cookie filter lists on Ublock Origin.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Consent-o-matic will actively reject cookies while most cookie filters hide the UI element or just presses OK.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They're going to get blocked anyway by uBlock Origin if it blocks their scripts

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Advertisers are like rapists. You not saying no means yes to them.

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That filter doesn't reject cookies. It just stops you from seeing the pop-up from my understanding.

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Which is meant to be the same as a rejection. If they have correctly implemented it is another thing.

Yeah, so I disabled those filters in uBlock Origin. I'd rather be annoyed by the pop-up and know I rejected what I could instead of being unsure.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 18 hours ago

I'll take those.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

That's actually a pretty genius product idea.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's a fundamental dichotomy here: the more I browse the web, the more cookies I end up with - not really what happens when I eat cookies.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I just have my browser delete all cookies whenever i close it - works the same way as with real cookies

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was just speaking in a general sense. I effectively do the same by using Firefox Focus/Klar on Android (with an ad-blocker "VPN") for much of my unimportant reading.

[–] deprecateddino@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

I only close by browser for updates, so I use Cookie AutoDelete which removes cookies when the tab is closed. That said, I still instinctively reject cookies when given the option.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Sorry but I'm gonna read that as "Eat preferences"

[–] dabster291@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago

That warning icon's making me lean towards slop.