Funny

Better off writing "this place is cursed and will kill those that enter"

This one looks cool, and I think that’s its biggest problem. It’s clearly a massive, man-made structure with no obvious purpose, yet with striking visual impact. To the hypothetical future civilization that is unaware of the dangerous nuclear waste, it basically begs to be investigated.

Bro of course Excalibur is under the field of death. Where else would you hide something so powerful?

Hop in, let's go

I like that idea. I don't think it matters how horrifying or repugnant or boring we try to make something. If something is made by humans, and humans forget what it was made for, eventually humans are going to explore it to try and figure that out.

On the other hand, nuclear waste is potentially valuable - or "valuable" - because It could be used to fuel more advanced reactors or make nuclear weapons. And I think that's part of the discussion. The people in charge don't want to bury it so deep that their nations can't retrieve it for future use.

Yeah, Carl Sagan was like "skull and crossbones"

But of course everyone else wanted to over-engineer it, so you get proposed solutions like encoding messages in the DNA of plants, and color-changing cats with an accompanying viral song that no one's ever heard of twelve years later... 🤦‍♀️

Like, guys, if people today can't even figure out what it means, then it's not a universal and enduring message.

And then some of the suggestions would only serve to make it a glaringly obvious archaeological dig site.

Skull and crossbones is about as universal as you can get. Maybe some atomic diagrams and radiation symbols, and written warnings in as many languages as possible, just in case people still understand them. And a giant slab that someone could only drill through deliberately, requiring heavy equipment.

I can't believe these were supposedly some of the smartest people in the world, and yet they made the mistakes of assuming that future civilizations would be hyperintelligent and thoroughly inquisitive, while also not understanding any symbols from our era and being likely to avoid areas designed to seem ominous. As if egyptologists today respect the warnings on ancient tombs.

And yet they overlooked the skull and crossbones because it seemed too obvious. The whole point is that it's supposed to be obvious!!!

Take a skull-and-crossbones. It might be taken to mean danger or poison. Or it might be taken to mean pirates or treasure. And if the future explorers did connect it with danger or poison, why wouldn't they also just think it was maybe a superstition meant to keep outsiders from getting "the good stuff," like the curses that were sealed into ancient Egyptian tombs?

What about when the time of Mammals is done, and the next inhabitant has a chitinous exoskeleton? I'm not sure they'd recognize bones as a sign of this place being dangerous.

The number one site archeologists are interested in is a graveyard. Because it tells you a lot about the people buried there.

For what its worth, Slotin in particular knew the consequences. If i recall correctly, he had a reputation for being a bit of a "cowboy" when it came to experimental protocol. I believe the lab even had specially made tools for handling the core, but Slotin insisted on using a screwdriver because it was easier.

Maybe, but Slotin knew exactly what kind of dangers he was dealing with. He just chose to be a nuclear cowboy instead.