this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
607 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

18326 readers
1366 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] mental_block@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Agriculture is only 12,000 years old. I suspect there are many more possible levels.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Laugh while you can, number boy.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Economics:

Let's turn this

GPcR9K6y9tmO6rF.png

Into this!

rgcwMA29iKIxsMm.png

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's capitalism. There are other forms of economics.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah but capitalist economics is all that they teach in the indoctrination system... Unless maybe you pay for it later in college.

And TBH the scientific credentials are pretty trash either way.

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any "scientific" field that produces Art Laffer is a fraud.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Dude isn't even a low point in econ. People like him are the reason econ exists.

[–] YummyEntropy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

99% of the time it's just astrology for men.

[–] jambudz@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Math is for useless things like solving Diophantine equations or playing with primes. I will not have math slandered by associating it with applications.

[–] Mauriciobravo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Math is doing the heavy lifting, economics is just borrowing the muscles and hoping no one notices. 😄

[–] Busyvar@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Most of the time it's just people working backward from whatever conclusion suits their politics.

[–] sga@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

well i seemingly have a very different viewpoint, because the most interesting economics bits are econometrics, essentially data science - the same things all other stem folks use to find the underlying distribution, estimators, their significance, finding the p value. Using this to model whole world is just as wrong as saying all of chem is solved by taking mendelev periodic table. sourely it works, and explains some stuff, but just knowing it does not predict all of chemistry. same way, for example ls-lm model (suppply demand curve) does not explain the whole world, and good economists do not claim they can explain it (sorry for using bad examples, 1 only took 2-3 eco courses).

[–] wallabra@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

He was the economist

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Economics is just applied statistics with a little sociology mixed in

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (22 children)

And simplified until linear relationships appear.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, my engineering degree also did this.

Good thing I learnt that linearity in my chosen specialty only breaks down in the exotic circumstances of air, room temperature, 1 atm pressure, and distances of <0,5 m or >30 m.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

In college - Assume everything is linear

Later - Everything is not linear

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Economics is just fascist sociology.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Economics, as an intellectual discipline, is closer to theology than physics. Its power is proportional to the belief it commands.

Finance is an arbitrary subset of mathematics, cherry picked to retroactively support a given economic model, and applied as its supporting mythology.

It’s entirely imaginary, which means alternatives are only ever a conjuring away.

The opposite. Its power is inversely proportional to the belief it commands.

The efficient market hypothesis only works if people don't believe it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Don't forget the other sibling: IT. Theoretical Computer Science is basically a form of mathematics, with all its algorithms and data structures that you can study and do proofs about.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Economics is the math of political science.

[–] quail@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

Economics is the fakest science ever. It's just perpetuating the capitalist scheme. Don't waste your time learning it. It'll all be irrelevant in the end anyways.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 108 points 2 days ago (22 children)

Economics is basically social psychology with some numbers sprinkled in.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 83 points 2 days ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago

No. Economics is the child of math, not a sibling. It's only half math. The other parent is philosophy/creative writing. That's how you end up with the myth of barter and trickle-down, the stuff based on speculative storytelling, that refuse to listen to math.

[–] YetiBeets@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ITT: People who have never studied economics incorrectly diagnosing all of its problems

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ITT: People incapable of justifying the scientific basis of economics.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

Economics as a field in theory is great. The problem is that it's been hijacked by capitalism, and 90% of the stuff taught in faculties is antiscientific. The founding grounds of neoliberal economics lay in the Austrian school, which prides itself in being non-falsifiable by evidence. Anything stemming from there is a pile of dogshit. Marxian economics and Modern Monetary Theory, on the other hand, have wonderful predictive capabilities and are proper science

load more comments
view more: next ›