this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
107 points (95.7% liked)

memes

15019 readers
3381 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (5 children)

You mean there's more of me out there?!

✅ No buffering, music starts instantly

✅ No connection issues

✅ No monthly money drain

✅ No arbitrary access or availability revocation

❌ No immediate access to any song I want to hear, but

✅ I'm patient

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I need to get a NAS and a sailing hat

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I fucking love my 100gb flac collection

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (11 children)

FLAC is a meme for 90% of use cases out there. The difference in sound quality between a .flac and 320 .mp3 is imperceptible to the majority of people and needs thousands of dollars of listening equipment to become apparent. The file size is drastically different, though. Not to mention the fact that almost all music is recorded in .wav files nowadays, and the "lossless" versions are usually just synthetically upscaled for the audiophile crowd.

Not to say that I don't prefer to download FLAC when possible, but I also don't avoid non-lossless albums either.

Um, .wav is a lossless format. It's just raw PCM with no compression. An upscaled FLAC from a lossy source is not lossless, even though it's stored in a lossless compatible format (FLAC). A properly encoded and compressed MP3 file will sound very close to the lossless source, but when procuring those lossy files from third parties, you rely on whoever compressed them doing it properly. I prefer to store my music repository in a lossless format, and stream/sync in lossy.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

The difference in sound quality between a .flac and 320 .mp3 is imperceptible to the majority of people and needs thousands of dollars of listening equipment to become apparent.

I would disagree with this. It isn't really a matter of equipment cost. It may be a matter of not having ever heard a direct comparison between versions of the same track, though.

What I've noticed is that you really need e.g. wired headphones to be able to hear this difference. The compression artifacts of MP3 are quite distinct, but since Bluetooth tends to compress audio as well, this eliminates a lot of the difference between lossy and lossless sources.

I can hear the difference clearly with cheap (≈$50) wired headphones on my android phone (which is nothing special and a few years old). It is particularly noticeable with high frequency sounds, like hi-hats, which tend to sound muddy with a kind of digital sizzle.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

The guy on the left has mp3, the guy on the right has aif and the guy in the middle has flac

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

The Enshittification has forced us to revisit the old way

[–] sidtirouluca@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

i only have 2000 :(

[–] Auster@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Bandcamp, Supraph Online, Ototoy, Uta 573, Steam and GOG's OSTs and Apple's iTunes store have been my to-go options. No DRM, no worries. Just avoid Apple's music subscription, as it is DRM'd.

Yall may hate on em, but Spotify has not only made my life easier in that I don't have to first pirate then sort all my music, but has also got me through some difficult times by recommending music that I would have never found otherwise. I've found groups that I love that have maybe 2000 monthly listens. Went to concerts in places I've never been for bands I never would have found. It's more than just listening to your own music. The Monday and Friday discover playlists have been more beneficial to me than most anything else on this planet.

[–] ZooGuru@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

What features have been removed from Spotify?

[–] Neato@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nothing if you're a premium user. Being able to pick songs on Free I think.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Being able to pick songs

Christ

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Plenty of things have been removed from Spotify or just bastardized over the years.

The app is so much less useful overall, so many controls are just gone. It's exhibit A for the dumbing down of modern apps. It went from being mature software designed to give users tools to control their experiences to a ranch designed solely to corral users into singular usage patterns.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Stephen304@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I recently started ripping all my Spotify playlists using spotdl to put them on my Plex. Spotdl doesn't actually download from Spotify but uses it as a source for the metadata to tag the files but it gets the audio by matching to YouTube music and downloading from there. From there I import to lidarr for renaming / organization.

[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Am I too FLAC to get these joke?

[–] Ozymati@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago

If I really like something, I get my own copy. Because I don't like corporations deciding what I'm allowed to enjoy.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder if I still have my Creative Nomad Jukebox somewhere... came out in 2000. Was the size and shape of a portable CD player so it fit in the same kind of cases. Took normal AA batteries. Had a 6 GB capacity, which was insane in 2000. I had a huge number of MP3s on it. Many radio dramas. I wish I still had them elsewhere.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Classmate of mine had a similar device, but blockyer. So many mp3's (Argos Jukebox)

I wanted mine to be pocketable, but i could not yet afford a real iPod. So i spent 150 euro on a 256 flash stick from MSI. 1 or 2 albums plus some spares.... Later I had an iPod and many headaches dealing with iTunes. The device was so great but iTunes already felt bloated to me back then.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Jukebox predated the iPod by a couple of years. I didn't mind the size and I had a backpack with a built-in case for a CD player with a little portal for the headphone wire, so I could put it right in there while I was walking to class (I was in college at the time).

I also got a second gen iPod for free as part of a pyramid scheme that went totally wrong. You had to sign up for a service to get a code and if you got enough codes, you got a free iPod. But you could cancel the service right away. More importantly, the codes could be used by multiple people and the system would accept it due to whatever crappy coding they did. So people would share their codes and I was one of the people near the top of the pyramid that got enough codes to do it before they figured it out.

I also had the trendy mp3 player pre-iPod, the Diamond Rio.

Looking back on it, I have no idea why I had so many mp3 players.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's harder to find (legal) downloadable music anymore too. 7Digital has been pretty alright for me, but I just stopped bothering with Spotify and Pandora and such. Youtube used to be great for discovery until they started mega cracking down on adblock again.

How often people are just getting rug-pulled left and right by streaming services is ridiculous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

FLAC master race check in.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

FLAC on a NAS for self-hosted streaming.

[–] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't really notice a difference it just takes up storage

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You'd probably notice it with better audio gear.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Absolutely.

I had gone awhile without buying any albums on cd. Icky Thump by the White Stripes came out, I downloaded it and had been jamming it in the car every day.

I took a friend out shopping and seen a copy and thought, “You know what? I want the album art.”

I took my burned cd out of the player and put the actual release on there.

“Boodoodwiddle dah boom boom boom boom boom boom boom, bah dah bow!!!”

I couldn’t believe how powerful it sounded.

I only fucked with flac after that.

[–] AceQuorthon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] afunkysongaday@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Please do forget about .ape. Proprietary, obscure format. Only advantage is that under some circumstances it can get you higher compression rates than flac. But it's way more resource intensive to decode so that advantage is really more theoretical. Use flac, forget ape.

load more comments
view more: next ›