this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
537 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

9536 readers
1289 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago

Homie applied to squid game.

[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 229 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago

Like fucking Neo.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 142 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

He got his answers.

Salary: Minimum

Responsibilities: Maximum

Work culture: Toxic

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 20 points 2 days ago

And that's why you should always ask about those things 😅

So basically every job that exists

[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 85 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I can get that the employer would want to dodge any salary discussion, but not even responsibilities and work culture? Does the position even say what is the job?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

"The job is you do what I tell you, and you do it RIGHT NOW! UNDERSTAND?"

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Come join our ever growing family if you enjoy fast pace work environments and every day being something new to discover!"

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Everything is always on fire and we have no plans to change the systemic causes of this, but we do sometimes get drunk and cheat on our spouses with each other."

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But aren't they're meant to be family?

"Help me step-coworker, I got stuck while using the photocopier"

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

taking notes And how many sleep with you coworker functions are there every year?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 2 days ago

At least one each quarter

#StrongerTogether
#OneFamily
#PizzaWednesday

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Tipping their hand that they didn't put at least a ballpark salary range in the listing, meaning they're trying to fuck you.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

"Pay? I don't know, what's the least you'll take?"

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

No responsibilities in the position description usually means "literally everything is going to roll downhill to your desk whenever someone feels like not doing their work".

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago

Fun fact: posting a job ad without a salary range isn’t even legal in California for any business that has more than something like 10 employees.

[–] nqua@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Some jobs are "buffer hires" (look it up) some jobs are "beeing the scapegoat for the real culprit at a higher position", either one wouldnt be really discussed in a regular interview.

when they dont want to discuss important basic things in the interview just pick your favorite one and ask if its such a position, but if you do, plz report how it went.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 52 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I’m just kind of stunned by the “summarize this email” button. It’s 3 sentences!

[–] f314@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah.. I saw this on a technical blog post for developers the other day and almost bust a blood vessel

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 51 points 3 days ago

"Read with my fucking eyes"

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Can they add a button "understand this for me"? I don't feel like a summary is reducing my effort enough. /s

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago

"get fucked"

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Do people regularly get emails long enough to justify a summary button? I think I've seen those maybe once out every thousand emails I get.

Or is it summarizing the whole thread?

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I do, but that's because I subscribe to hobby newsletters that tend to run long. I wouldn't use a summary button because I want every bit of that content.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 2 days ago

Some people do feel the need to write essays for emails.

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

Not regularly, but sometimes I'll come back to work after a few days off, and find one of those threads of 200 emails pinging around chaotically.

In those cases, I'm happy to let Copilot try and figure out what the hell was going on. Worst case it gives me a dogshit summary and I'm no worse off.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 days ago

In my region, failure to disclose salary on the job description is illegal.

It's a DEI law, since hard salary negotiation supposedly favours one group over another, and for us that's a hard law to fight with a huge compensation cap.

So the employer already comes off as a sleazeball.

[–] Snowman_sir@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Ask where the exit to building is. RUN!

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Cheap rage bait.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

This is fake.

[–] Boppel@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

sounds professional - is the very opposite. you were lucky

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

This is fake/satire... No one is going to tell you cannot ask about responsibilities