this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
1348 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

82070 readers
3121 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media's coverage of how people are using Meta's Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to be a tiny part of resistance against surveillance tech.”

more at: @feed@404media.co

https://tech.lgbt/@yjeanrenaud/116122129025921096

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

are you filming this? 👊

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 274 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Admittedly, this is cyberpunk as fuck. 

Should not be needed… but it’s a fucking cool solution. 

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 32 points 5 days ago

Install this on kali nethunter and make glassholes pay for their crimes.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Next step is for someone makes a version that hijacks the Bluetooth headphones and makes them play a loud shrill noise that makes the glasses too uncomfortable to wear in your pressence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 147 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Wasnt there a ton of outrage and such incl people not being allowed on planes, back when google glass was released?

Why is it all OK now?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 5 days ago

Same reason our governments suck ass. Something unpopular tries to get passed again, and again, and again, and again, and eventually people get desensitized and worn out from trying to fight against it. That or it hits on the right time when people are distracted by something else bigger or more important.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 62 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I remember Google Glass itself receiving a ton of outrage actually: People hated it and anyone wearing one was made fun of ("glassholes" was a popular insult at the time).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 49 points 5 days ago

Many years of indoctrination. When Google glass was introduced, it was just 'a neat idea'. Now it's a product, and therefore it's clearly more trustworthy because someone is profiting from it. (/s)

There's a window of attention for public discourse and there's fatigue. We, as a group, can only be upset about so much. It's a tried tactic to just try to distract us with some crazy shit, like Trump did with the alien files. If one crazy thing comes up in the news, other stuff will drop from our radar. And that's why people try shit again and again and again. Always in the hope that this time people are distracted by other stuff or are finally worn down enough.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It still isn't OK.

It is just that the technology became so small, you can't differentiate with regular sunglasses anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Years of privacy violations going deeper and deeper under pretend of "progress" and "pRoTeCt the cHiLdReN". I am glad that people started rebelling against Flock, and some removed their Amazon cameras following the Superbowl's ads, but that's not even close to how much we should be mad at these mass surveillance actors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 5 days ago (29 children)

You know what sucks?

In that AR glasses, in theory, are such an interesting technology with lots of potential, and certainly a piece of tech I would love to have and work with and on. Not to secretly record people, but to, well.. augment my field of view with whatever digital tools or displays I would like. It would be so useful

It's honestly kinda saddening to me that it most likely will get completely ruined by our current toxic relationship to technology. A step towards our ever increasing cyberdystopia, and not towards enchanting our limited lives

Obviously either way I don't trust Meta, but an open-hardware device running a FOSS AR system? It would be nice..

I still hold out hope that this somehow could be resolved, and I would love to contribute to open software for these devices. Maybe one day soon-ish I will. My expertise should be well applicable, after all

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 45 points 5 days ago (12 children)

It would be incredibly useful in construction. Having a digital overlay telling you exactly where to put up the framing for a separating wall, or an overlay showing the correct distance between screws, or where wires and pipes are inside a wall? There are so incredibly many awesome possible uses for AR in construction.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 102 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Paywalled article. Here's the link to the app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.pocketpc.nearbyglasses

Edit: it's licensed under a license I never heard of. I'm curious, I don't understand why it was needed.

"Why draft new licenses? Until now, there has been no standardization of this kind of source code license, even though it has become increasingly common. This has resulted in confusing and overlapping licenses, which need to be analyzed one at a time. Lack of standardization has used up the time and resources of many in the software industry, as well as their lawyers. The objective of the PolyForm Project is standardization and reduction of costs for developers and users."

Seems like that exact XKCD about standards.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (6 children)

That license looks like Creative Commons Non-Comercial, which is not an open source license.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 64 points 5 days ago (4 children)

This is an unpopular opinion, but using licenses to actively prevent commercial exploitation of voluntary communal labor is not a bad thing. I would even argue that allowing commercial exploitation of free, communally-maintained software is downright unethical. I don’t tolerate this pejorative “it’s not open source unless the rich and powerful can exploit it” bullshit.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 23 points 5 days ago

This is not a remotely unpopular opinion, sharing is awesome and corpos can suck it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 28 points 4 days ago (16 children)

I agree but the biggest defense for this is to always assume you're being recorded when in public even if you're not. You never know.

The issue becomes relevant in private spaces, to me. Nobody with smart glasses is coming into my home.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't this boil down to self-censorship in public? Better not critizise the government in public becaus you never know whos waring smart glasses...

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree with the core of your point. I'd like to assert, though, that all people exert some level of self-censorship in public on the basis of the opinions of their neighbors and peers. Having to worry about powerful organizations like governments and megacorps also always being there (instead of just sometimes, or usually) adds a new degree of reason to self-censor, for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Perfect response. Record someone without consent, it should be the last time those glasses are wearable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] moebiusstrop@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago

Github (APK) link, if you're on a privacy phone: https://github.com/yjeanrenaud/yj_nearbyglasses

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Open season on meta wearers when?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 18 points 4 days ago

meta is all about surveillance cant expect anything less

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I mean, eventually there are going to be people with camera's stealthily integrated directly into their eyeballs recording non-stop.

Like that black mirror episode letting people relive any moment from their past.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It apparently works with the bluetooth signals which I found really smart.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (11 children)

I know next to nothing about the glasses, but would they be vulnerable to anything the Flipper Zero is capable of doing?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago (3 children)

How hard can you throw it?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 22 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Doesn't work 😮‍💨 push "start scanning" and nothing happens.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 50 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

It's supposed to ask for Bluetooth access at that point, did it?

Also from the GitHub page:

if you don't see the scan starting, you might need to enable Foreground Service on your particular phone in the Settings menu [in the app's settings, not the phone's]

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›