this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
141 points (99.3% liked)

politics

28780 readers
2663 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago

I think we ended up with an incentive structure where people are lucratively compensated for fully batshit-insane takes that drive engagement, and this moves the Overton window to normalize what used-to-be a batshit take.

I also think it's worth investigating those incentives and burning them to the ground and salting the soil beneath them

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 40 points 10 hours ago

Fucking psychotic. These people have an actual mental illness, and they're trying hard as hell to normalize it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

Everything they accuse the left of is a confession with the RWAs.

Also, I remember when Ann Coulter wrote some book about how McCarthy really wasn't soooo bad you guyz!

Huh, wonder why.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 20 points 10 hours ago

they will not live through the attempt.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago

How dare you care about people having problems you aren't currently experiencing. You should be locked up for that. Don't worry about the people being locked up. Those are problems good citizens aren't currently experiencing.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

What exactly McCarthyism for our times looks like is still in flux. Loomer declined to elaborate when I asked. In my conversations with Bannon, he was enthusiastic about bringing McCarthy into the modern political moment, but vague about the details. Posobiec, though he declined to talk, has been a little more precise. In the 2024 book, Unhumans, he and his co-author, Joshua Lisec, wrote that renewing McCarthyism would mean employing the “humiliation tactic” of “naming and shaming” leftists, and a return to the blacklists of the Red Scare.

This is just more reactionary purity spiral nonsense from people who are paid way too much to invent hyper-inflammatory political sophistry. Ironically, protected speech like this would not be possible in the oppressive government they lazily describe.

They should watch more TNG.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Posobiec, though he declined to talk, has been a little more precise. In the 2024 book, Unhumans, he and his co-author, Joshua Lisec, wrote that renewing McCarthyism would mean employing the “humiliation tactic” of “naming and shaming” leftists, and a return to the blacklists of the Red Scare.

I've not finished the book yet, but it is wild.

They see Communists everywhere. And the Communists (because cultural Marxism is a real thing, and progressives == leftists == Democrats == socialists == liberals == Communists. They are ALL EXACTLY THE SAME. Don't question it, LOL. Everything to the left of Rush Limbaugh is just famously unified, you guys, everyone knows this.) are coming for your STUFF!

It's what they do.

^ By the way, I heard Noem say what sounded an awful like this refrain when she was whining about one of the people questioning her about things like her bang plane. I'm thinking she has read the book.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but back then there was actually a respectably sized Communist movement in the US. Not so much now

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean don't get me wrong they weren't a huge movement, but compared to now they were much bigger then.

The Communist Party of the USA (CPUSA) hit peak membership in the late 40's, before being hit hard by the post-ww2 red scare/McCarthyism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Communist_Party_USA

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Membership of the CPUSA peaked in the late 1940s, with over 75,000 members in 1947.[5] But their influence spanned beyond just their membership as some candidates in national elections garnered over 100,000 votes.

Apparently there were about 143.7 million people in the United States at the time.

Anyway, in all of my life, I've only met one person (IRL) that admitted they were a capital-C Communist.