this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
62 points (95.6% liked)

Games

47189 readers
1131 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 3 points 30 minutes ago

I hope so. I played the game last year and everything felt a bit lackluster and janky. It's a pretty fun game, but I hope 1.0 adds that polish it needs.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 50 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Not really sure it's for me but I am just happy that it really annoys Nintendo

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Out ofthe loop here. Why does Nintendo care?

[–] orenj@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It kinda looks like the pikachu game

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 30 seconds ago

Detective Pikachu?

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (4 children)

They plagiarized a bunch of Pokemon and used the publicity generated to bring attention to their game (which admittedly has nothing to do with Pokémon aside from the aforementioned similar-looking monsters).

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 16 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If memory serves, the plagiarism allegations were doctored. Nintendo tried to find whatever they could sue them for, and it wasn't plagiarizing monster designs; it was for things like "riding a captured creature" and "catching creatures by throwing a ball at them". Some aspect of Japanese law allowed for them to make new patents after Palworld came out and then sue them for it retroactively.

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world -5 points 47 minutes ago (3 children)

I'm not talking about what went into court. Most pals are "legally distinct" monsters, but that's what brought the game to public awareness, what started the comparisons with Pokémon, and why Nintendo hated their guts. Monster collectors have existed outside of Pokémon for decades and still do, Nintendo only sued Palworld because they copy-pasted their monsters with a different color palette.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 9 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

What brought the game to court compared to the other monster collectors is that this one made a shit-ton of money, and the other ones didn't, so Nintendo and The Pokemon Company were, for the first time, threatened.

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world -4 points 24 minutes ago

They wouldn't feel threatened by Palworld if it wasn't for the legally distinct™ designs because, at its core, Palworld is a completely different game that only vaguely resembles Pokémon on a very superficial level (the monster themselves).

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

If it's legally not considered copy-pasting their monsters, why do you feel like you can assert that it is plagiarism? I suppose that's your opinion, and you're entitled to it, but I also think people have a right to call you out on it for saying it as if it's a fact when it is not actually a recognized fact. Plenty of people would dispute that, including myself, and certainly Pocketpair would, and evidence suggests the courts probably would've agreed with them hence it wasn't even worth pursuing legally.

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world -1 points 11 minutes ago

You can dispute that Palworld didn't copy-paste Pokémon body parts and palette swap their designs to create their legally distinct clones, but I'd call that bullshit. People only side with PocketPair because they plagiarized Nintendo, which people (rightfully) hates. If it was done to anyone else, nobody would defend them. I can hate Nintendo and still posit that what PocketPair did was shitty and an insult to all the devs who actually take pride in their work and put effort in creating something original.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 44 minutes ago

If you dont like that you should see the titan bars I got from Aldi.

[–] eyes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

Actually they're suing because of these alleged infringement of these weirdly general patents:

  1. throwing an item at a character in a field triggering a combat state.
  2. capturing creatures in the wild, rather than in a battle setting.
  3. riding creatures in an open world and transitioning between those creatures.
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

Nintendo alleges that they plagiarized their assets.

The thing is, there was a solid argument to be made that some of the meshes for certain Pals were too similar to that of some Pokémon models to be a coincidence, but Nintendo didn't bring any of that up in the lawsuit. They opted to go for the much more flimsy "riding a character" and "summoning a character by throwing a ball/sphere".

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

I thought GameFreak owned Pokemon.

[–] orenj@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 hour ago

Hey, I doubt it! Still totally on board to spite nintendo tho

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

I was planning on starting a new world once 1.0 drops and was worried how big this update will be. This gives me some confidence. I really like what they have done so far and can‘t wait to see how they‘ll wrap it up.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 hour ago

There's another game that mashed Pokémon and Palworld called Pickmon i think, still in early access but they are copying both games shamelessly.

[–] FirmDistribution@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I was thinking about buying this game on a sale.

Can anybody tell me how the game compares to its first release? The game peaked at 2 million consecutive players, that's a lot!

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I last played it a couple of months ago. It's significantly more fleshed out than the initial release, which seemed pretty empty and boring by comparison. Crafting isn't really my thing but they make it relatively easy and not as annoying as many other games. Overall it's worth checking out. I enjoyed it a lot more than I thought I would

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Any updates on the legal side of things? Didn't Nintendo officially open up a lawsuit not too long ago?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 minute ago

Nintendo mostly lost. They did have to make some minor game updates, glider pals no longer appear when gliding, and you can't throw a captured pal's sphere on summon.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Afaik Nintendo lost!