this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chicago Bears

2 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Look who he’s grouped next to. This deal probably isn’t as bad as Claypool but it’s close. I pray we don’t give this guy a monster contract and compound the mistake.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Puzzleheaded-Ear9487@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Whatever man…be happy to complain based on nothing.

Claypool was a player Pittsburgh wanted to get rid of and the Bears had to believe they can turn him around. Sweat is a proven pass rusher who Washington wanted to keep.

Of course, it could not work out but you’re stretching here finding this subjective numbers to prove your point.

[–] Fastball82@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

So we don’t have a great edge rusher…we go out & get one….& that’s….bad??

[–] IMKudaimi123@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Just as any stat, PRWR isn’t an end all be all

PFF, counting stats, the eye test, and I’m sure other advanced metrics have him as a very good DE

We can talk semantics like overpaying (probably was should’ve only give a third considering the contract situation) but we got a damn good player. No doubt about that.

[–] RusselmurdoC@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Exactly. Look at who he is next to. You realize that teams can't double team both of them every snap right? This will free up Yannick and/or Sweat. This should lead to multiple sacks a game here on out