this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
267 points (99.3% liked)

Buy European

10042 readers
299 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 5 points 15 hours ago

I approve the "Cory Doctorow's law".

Please do, only a handful of wealthy people actually benefit from IP laws. The Americans defending it claim to be creative but are somehow unable to imagine anything better than intentional monopolies.

"The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed." โ€” Steve Biko

Sincerely,
an American who makes IP for a living

[โ€“] Squizzy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Roll back to 20 year copyright on media. Absolute bullshit for grandkids to be authorities on works created by people they didnt know and had no hand in creating.

[โ€“] obvs@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this point, itโ€™s been pretty well proven that the idea of intellectual property does a lot more harm just in general than any problem it supposedly solves.

You want to end all of the monopolies? Take away the idea that ideas can be owned.

And all of these companies that routinely buy off elections? They canโ€™t compete with free.

All of these medicines which cost ten million dollars per pill? People would LOVE to pay $5 per pill for them.

The idea of intellectual property does NOT spur innovation. That claim is laughable. What it DOES spur is the creation of the least valuable workable solution, and then the smallest possible incremental improvement whenever the patent or copyright is about to run out. It literally PREVENTS useful technologies from coming to market, and prevents the poor(who would rush into many job markets if there werenโ€™t literal IP restrictions on them) from working in many cases.

[โ€“] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I do think that creators should get a chance with their creations, be it a character a technology or a drug. I just dont think Mickey Mouse should belong to someone now.

[โ€“] PheasantPlucker@feddit.uk 2 points 13 hours ago

It's ok for Mickey Mouse to belong to someone - as a trademark. But the old films should be out of copyright.

[โ€“] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or simply repeal the DRM laws that are the basis of the most exploitative US businesses. As Cory Doctorow has pointed out earlier

[โ€“] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldnโ€™t that be an outcome of this?

[โ€“] 9bananas@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

yes: it's the same thing.

[โ€“] TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI is ignoring so many IP laws while the US government continues to push and collude with its cartels, all the while making sure the technology bubble is all AI and is all US centered. The EU certainly needs to do something, but I imagine many in the EU don't want to put their own IP at risk.

[โ€“] huppakee@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago

don't want to put their own IP at risk.

Understandably if you ask me. Instead of abolishing copyright laws we should just quiet quit on protecting US intellectual property and let everyone get away with infringing us copyright and give back the peoples access to to open seas ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ.

[โ€“] Bazell@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't need army and nukes to fuck up the USA. All you need is to hit its economy.

[โ€“] andallthat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And then there's Trump, who's managing to use the US army to fuck up everyone's economy, including their own. Talk about thinking ouside the box...

[โ€“] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

Years ago they gave Apple a patent for using your face to open your phone, neither of which are technologies with any link to Apple. That's all you need to know.

[โ€“] Paragone@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

THIS was an appropriate time to be using falsifying-quotes:

the "nuclear" option.

Unfortunately, Netanyahu's nearly-certainly weighing the actual nuclear option on Iran, then ALL Muslim-countries, the minute ANYone retaliates ( mass-shooting, nuclear style ).

Which means that keeping things clear, differentiating between "nuclear" & nuclear, would be wise.

_ /\ _

this does get me. What is the us leverage at this point? Why is any coutry going along at this point with our crazy ip laws?

[โ€“] Zwiebel@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

This shit is two months old??

[โ€“] DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Certainly an interesting prospect. Good to see you hear on the fediverse too!