this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
707 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

83027 readers
3349 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

Manufactured probable cause.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

But in fact USA and Israel are the countries that spy on anyone. I am more concern about USA and Israel spying than from India and China. In this point in history USA and Israel are the enemy of the world.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Consumer grade.

Because if they try and ban cisco they'll collapse

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Cisco is an American company though.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 1 hour ago

Not manufactured in the US

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 49 points 15 hours ago (14 children)

Next up, foreign VPNs and shortwave radios are illegal to use.

Then phone calls are restricted.

Then international mail has to be inspected and censored.

All hail Chairman Trump!

USA USA 👊🇺🇸🔥

[–] Quexotic 6 points 9 hours ago

https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2026/PSA260312

Compromised devices already comprise what amounts to a foothold within US network infrastructure that makes attribution of actors and defense of critical infrastructure impossible.

It's actually a really good situation for China since they have access to millions of these compromised devices in police stations, fire stations, hospitals, within critical infrastructure networks etc.

Also, the equivalent of mail censorship is already being done by more subtle means.

The US is more fucked than you know. I just hope the US doesn't piss china off too much. The asymmetric warfare will claim more lives of civilians than combatants.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Unintentionally shutting down ai data centers. Lol, we know this will only be selectively enforced!

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Well it does say consumer-grade. Not sure what the reasoning there is, as backdoors in enterprise equipment would be much worse for national security

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 51 minutes ago

Producers of consumer-grade routers that receive Conditional Approval from DoW or DHS can continue to receive FCC equipment authorizations. Interested applicants are encouraged to submit applications to conditional-approvals@fcc.gov

A very speculative, cynical interpretation: something of value will be exchanged for the privilege of conditional approval.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Enterprise grade equipment comes with entire teams dedicated to securing it, with various overlapping services intended to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities. Along with enterprise level agreements around usage and support.

Consumer grade is just fire and forget, you're on your own.

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

enterprise equipment manufacturers have already paid the bribe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)

I can understand the FTC being involved because trade. But the FCC? Maybe regulatory authority over WiFi? But this seems like massive over reach.

Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago

How about the bit where they say home routers have to be approved by the DHS or the "Department of War"? This is not normal.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago

Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

I only remember when conservatives lied everytime they opened their mouths.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

They still do claim that, but every federal republican administration since I have been born has spent more than it brought in, and has a less fiscally conservative record than every administration from the other major party, whom they tarred as fiscally irresponsible the entire time. I am almost 50.

[–] halowpeano@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

I mean... "Small government" Republicans were always demonstrably lying, as far back as any of them have been alive. Every one of them just wanted to shift money from things that support people to the pockets of their donors.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

The excuse that it's for security reasons just immediately falls apart when you get to this part of the article:

The notice from the FCC states that companies can apply for conditional approval for new products from the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security. However, that requires the businesses to provide a plan for shifting at least some of their manufacturing to the US in order to receive that conditional approval.

So it's fine to supposedly threaten national security if you do some more manufacturing in the US? Uh-huh. How does that balance out exactly?

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

The unwritten part is where Trump gets a free gold plated golf cart or some other stupid shit to sweeten the deal.

Its grift allllll the way down.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 17 hours ago (8 children)

I hate to say anything that would defend any of this, but cheap Chinese routers are very prone to security issues. There's a guy that has a youtube channel built arond taking apart and reverse engineering all kids of electroncis. He's found some pretty bad stuff in generic routers, static logins, telemetry sent home, remote executable code in the admin portal while not logged in.

I agree there's a lot more here they hope to gain, and that those gains are their primary objective, but there are some real issues from consumer network electronics.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

That may be true and is certainly a well known concern …. Yet given the US government’s recent history, I have a hard time believing much of what they say

Cheap Chinese routers as a risk being true doesn’t prevent it from also being true that the current us administration is full of shit and likely more concerned about enriching someone connected to them, or tilt at windmills

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (4 children)

There's better ways to do it then, EU don't have that problem for example, and we buy plenty from China.

We just have safety and security standards enshrined into law, and don't deal with anyone that doesn't agree to follow them.

It's why some products have the C€ symbol on them, which is "this has been imported, and meets all legal requirement", and all shops are not allowed to sell anything without that cert if imported.

(Though this don't apply to direct-to-consumer delivery from other nations, so it's not bulletproof)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 50 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is a law to:

  1. get bribes or favors from telecom equipment manufacturers.
  2. Create a framework to force backdoors into consumer equipment.
  3. Force users to use ISP provided equipment.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] w3ird_sloth@lemmy.world 27 points 21 hours ago

Use openwrt.

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Build your own open WRT router or get one of theirs. It's the best way to go and you don't get dragged through the monthly fee wringer for stupid child security or other stuff that is not well designed.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

If you're building your own router I'd recommend OPNsense. I hear PFsense is also good.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

Yea but the n100 I got to run it was made in China. I think I'm breaking the law now 🤣

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Even more isolationism. Knowing how the usa works, they discovered the equipment was set up for spying on their people and they want all of that "spying on their own people" power for themselves.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Gold colored Trump Router incoming

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 71 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This only applies to routers.

It's not widely known outside the ham radio community, but part of the 2.4GHz wifi band overlaps the 13cm amateur radio band. If you turn off 5GHz wifi and lock the 2.4GHz AP to Channel 1, it qualifies as a ham radio, and can be sold as a ham radio instead of an AP/Router. You do need a ham radio license to operate it as a Ham AP, but you do not need a license to buy a Ham AP.

If the end user wants to turn on 5GHz after the fact, there is not a damn thing the FCC can do about it.

load more comments (5 replies)

I have done a couple similar setups. Fun facts: cell towers have asymmetrical signal and if you are too close, your signal is bad. Those are hard ones to explain to farmers that have towers installed on their properties.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

TPLink needed to get their shit in order for years. This has been cooking since 2019. However, this administration is just turned it into a bribery scheme.

load more comments
view more: next ›