this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
823 points (98.5% liked)

Political Memes

11438 readers
1947 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"IsRaEl HAs A RiGhT To DefEND iTSelF" - Absolute Brainlets

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 7 points 5 hours ago

The zionists only think they have the right to defend themselves. Palestine, Lebanon, and Iran don't have the right to defend themselves from the attacks of Israel.

[–] zuana@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Fug 'em both.

[–] 33550336@lemmy.world 34 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago
[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 89 points 14 hours ago (11 children)

Fuck Russia, fuck Israel, fuck the United States, fuck China.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 49 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

That is how get all the STIs.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

State transmitted Imperialism.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

At least I'll be giving them to someone deserving then.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 14 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Now let's play the game : does the poster mean both should be legitimate, or both condemned ?

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That doesn't seem to be the message. Instead, it's that the NYT (along with the rest of mainstream/establishment media) self-censures criticism of Israel, by using more neutral terms.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Hopefully the latter.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Suppose I say "if you're ok with X then you should be ok with Y, because X and Y are equivalent" and "if you're not ok with X then you should not be ok with Y because X and Y are equivalent". Do I mean I'm ok with X or not?

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] Steve@startrek.website 25 points 12 hours ago

If it weren't for double standards we wouldn't have any standards at all.

[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 37 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must"

We are back in a period of great power actors. I should brush up on my Thucydides.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We haven't been out of that period for 200 years. The current set of actors are just more clumsy and less elegant.

The US seems to want to emulate 1800s Britain I guess.

[–] DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk 3 points 8 hours ago

Let's hope the Luddites are more successful this time.

load more comments
view more: next ›