this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
18 points (76.5% liked)

Programming

26268 readers
271 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
UlrikHD@programming.dev
bugsmith@programming.dev
Spyro@programming.dev
18
Working on products people hate (www.seangoedecke.com)
submitted 20 hours ago by codeinabox@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

If I were a better developer, would I have worked on more products people love? No. Even granting that good software always makes a well-loved product, big-company software is made by teams, and teams are shaped by incentives.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] calliope@piefed.blahaj.zone 26 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

If I were a better developer, would I have worked on more products people love? No

There you go, justify your shitty work.

If you were a better person, you would work on better products.

You choose where you work and what you work on. The fact that you went from Zendesk working on a shitty product to Microsoft working on a shitty product is definitely about you.

In fact, a reliable engineer ought to be comfortable working on products people hate, because engineers work for the company, not for users.

“It’s ok that I work at shitty companies! They pay me more”

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not trying to defend that guy but I work for who is hiring when I'm out of work. I've spent 11 out of the last 40 months unemployed, and as a result I have no retirement savings to speak of — I can't afford to turn down work. I've worked for Ford, Home Depot, Autozone, Uline (honestly felt so relieved to get laid off, that place was fucking scummy), the Army, and a shit ton of places you've never heard of. I had to turn down working for an insurance company — and I think they are pretty shitty — because they wanted to pay 1/3 what I'm making today. And I make fucking nothing compared to Silicon Valley.

engineers work for the company, not for users.

On the other hand I've never made any bones about the fact that I work to develop good products and if someone can make money on that good for them, but I fight for the best design for end users I can. I have mostly developed internal software, though, and no one but me cares about internal users. You can tell because everywhere you go, front line workers are bitching about garbage software.

I might be wrong about the best solution, but I refuse to be evil. Even at Uline, I worked to make better software for the workers. But what a bunch of assholes.

[–] calliope@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 hours ago

On the other hand I've never made any bones about the fact that I work to develop good products and if someone can make money on that good for them, but I fight for the best design for end users I can.

Your entire comment nailed it for me. Thank you for reading between the lines of my snarky annoyance and expressing it more eloquently.

I also love internal tooling and worked at shitty, bizarre places (General Dynamics, for one. Speaking of “places you’ve never heard of,” right?), and literally the entire reason to work there is to try make it better for the people who use the thing. Not doing that is preposterous to me!

Somehow the original author ignored the only thing I would care about. Or it’s there and I missed it.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 40 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Perhaps it's just me, but to me this article feels like belittling the problem by not differentiating between "hated" products and "harmful" products.

If a company makes you work on something that is hated, it's fair and good to have sympathy. If a company makes you work on something that is harmful or unethical, like many perceive Co-Pilot to be, then an article about getting user hate that doesn't talk at all about ethics feels a little tonedeaf.

I don't know, perhaps that's just me. I certainly don't envy the writer for being employed to work on it.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 5 points 14 hours ago

Perhaps it's just me, but to me this article feels like belittling the problem by not differentiating between "hated" products and "harmful" products.

Exactly!

Hated product? Oh well. My paycheck still cashes.

Harmful product? Oh shit. Sorry boss. I'm still working on that. It's been confusing, but we almost got it. Annnyyyy day now, boss. Pretty sure we will get it on track next sprint. Or the one after. (Source: I once got well paid to "accidentally" kill at least one truly shit-head idea. It probably cost me a pay raise, but I left soon after for more money, and I'm still proud of that every time I reflect back on it.)

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 16 hours ago

This entire article feels like cope.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

“Harm”? What is “harm”? There are only well-made products or not-so-well-made products!

[–] unique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 57 minutes ago

A well-made online gambling "game" is harmful

[–] emerald@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 18 hours ago

People are mad at me for helping to build the torment nexus :(

But at least that means people are being tormented by the torment nexus :)