this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
468 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29181 readers
2627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FatherPeanut@pawb.social 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

He's absolutely gonna push congress to legislate a National Voter ID system within a month of elections, isn't he?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They can't pass the SAVE act, it won't make it through the Senate filibuster.

[–] heatofignition@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Unless Chuck caves under 0 pressure again

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

There are 44 other Senators who can kill the bill by simply stating their intent to filibuster. Even if Chuck caves.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 hours ago

Yep. He sure is, so that there's no way it could possibly be implemented in time, and then he'll use the resulting chaos as 'proof' of voting fraud

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And the wheels of justice shall turn slowly. In December 2027, they'll rule that people should have been allowed to vote in November 2026

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So quickly? I was thinking the ruling would come down 4-5 years after the event

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

Was I being too optimistic?

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Democrats are currently furrowing their brows, drafting stern letters, and making appeals to norms and traditions.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

What do you need to do?

This EO has all of the legal weight of a blog post.

Article 4 Section 1

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The only groups that have power over elections is the State and Congress.

Trump can draft an EO declaring himself king of mars. He can write anything in an EO, he's the E. A state can simply ignore it, it has no chance of surviving a motion for a TRO.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

they got to ride that thin line of not alienating the fence sitters of genocide and not genocide, and still pretend to care to feed their vote blue no matter who base

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Aren't the state's responsible for running the election system?

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 9 hours ago

Yeah there's this pesky little thing called the constitution that explains that.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

Yes, until the SCROTUS says the president is as well.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

The rules of Monolopoly say absolutely nothing happens on Free Parking. The official rules mean nothing if nobody follows them in practice

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Federal elections, instead of state elections?

So that means no more electoral college, right? Right?

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Elections are 100% controlled by the states, there is nothing they can do to force states to comply with this stupid shit. Trump is an utter fucking moron.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

A bunch of states are going to kowtow to him anyway, a judge is going to declare it unconstitutional, Trump's going to throw a hissyfit & bomb Djibouti or some shit as distraction and Congress is going to pass it anyway.

Trump is an utter moron, being supported by utter morons, with utter morons calling rational people "the real morons" for daring to ask "wait, what?"

I'm tired, and I can't weld good enough to make a Killdozer...

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think you need to be a very good welder for that particular project.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago

My "welding" experience consists of soldering parts onto circuit boards. I don't think that will help much with thick steel plates. Can't have a Killdozer that falls apart mid rampage.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If you're a registered Democrat, you're going to get a late night visit from ICE.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

castle doctrine gonna suck for ice

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Own a modern firearm to shoot fascists foot soldiers, as the founding fathers intended...

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Fuck that we tally ho.

They are not prepared to deal with cannons. Or revolutionary war recreationists

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Still playing the accordion, I see.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

States rights blah blah blah right?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 19 hours ago

we are a christian country!!! oh you can't minister to our detainees.

load more comments
view more: next ›