this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
126 points (99.2% liked)

Programming

26304 readers
608 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seadoo@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Fun, but annoying when articles like this reference online resources like github repos and hackernews threads without linking to them anywhere

https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code Maybe the hackernews thread? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584540

[–] AstroLightz@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

So is "Claw Code" supposed to mean Claude? I don't see any explanation of what the repo actually is.

[–] talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Anthropic pulled the npm package within hours and issued a statement: the exposure was "a release packaging issue caused by human error, not a security breach."

I'm sure they chose the words "human error" to also imply the error is not to blame on their LLM, which remains an open question after reading the article (and likely will forever, although at the very least it would seem like the LLM did not detect this mistake).

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, I had a good laugh at this. Half of the commits I review are coauthored by Claude, a fact that I'm sure Anthropic is thrilled to claim, but this colossal fuck up was obviously the work of a rogue intern or something.

[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 73 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The clean-room approach created a novel legal puzzle. Gergely Orosz (The Pragmatic Engineer) observed that Anthropic faces a dilemma: a Python rewrite constitutes a new creative work potentially outside DMCA reach. If Anthropic claims the AI-generated transformative rewrite infringes copyright, it could undermine their own defense in training-data copyright cases - the same argument that AI-generated outputs from copyrighted inputs constitute fair use.

The only moral justification for an AI rewrite. Love it.

[–] talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

My guess they are not even gonna challenge the "clean room" rewrite legally: the damage is done and it's not really gonna be mitigated if they manage to take down the rewrite.

[–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 29 points 12 hours ago