this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
414 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

11285 readers
1862 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Billions of dollars could have paid for a lot of security engineers. Wonder how many issues they could have found and fixed.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What is the 'instruction to mislead' referring to?

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Likely the directive in the source code for users internal to Anthropic that the LLM should not make any reference to being an LLM or mention model names etc in commit messages or comments. So when they contribute code to external repos it's not immediately identifiable as LLM generated

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

The poison pills that are there to mislead you if you try to reverse engineer it

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 27 points 16 hours ago

Guy on TV this morning saying they've 'created a new species' and I'm like yeh, you've created a group of humans so dumb that no other human would be willing to have kids with them.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 7 points 13 hours ago

Time for the Anthropic Apologists. I’ve noticed a lot of them recently.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The company's shoddy opsec doesn't directly equate to the model's cabapilities. I am not one to believe anyone's hype, but I am not one to believe the AI anti-hype that goes on throughout Lemmy. A year ago, according to Lemmy, LLMs could never produce working code at scale. 6 months ago, according to Lemmy, LLMs could never produce working code that was secure enough to use in production. Now, Lemmy believes LLM can't be disruptive to cybersecurity as a whole.

In 6 months I wonder what Lemmy will claim LLMs aren't capable of.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah this is very linear. Just because something sucks in someways doesn’t make in wholly incapable of other things.

[–] Franconian_Nomad@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago

Current models are getting decent at some things, while still being kinda shitty at other things. So this is not as contradicting as it sounds.