this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
266 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

84019 readers
3238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

On Linux, when you update, it downloads the latest thing and installs it. 10 minutes tops. On arch you gotta watch it a bit more, but you signed up for that.

On windows it updates almost as frequently as Linux. Except it takes much longer to update. A new install can sit there churning for more than a half hour. Why? Didn’t I just download the latest iso? Even the incremental ones are painful. It also does this sequential crap where it updates, reboots, and then updates again. (Sometimes even a third time). Then you’ve got the bugs. I don’t think there’s been a single windows update in over a year that just went smoothly. I’ve run across two that flat out refused to install (blocking further updating), and one that broke things.

Windows update is bad enough for a regular use case. It’s downright painful if you haven’t booted windows in a while (think dual boot setups) where you have to pay this update tax just because you switched to windows to do that one thing.

The author is not being whiny, they are 100% correct.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This situation was the reason for me killing off my dual boot system and making it Linux only. I had kept Windows around for a few specific tools and games, but it was a roll of the dice if I could even use it when I needed because of the update situation.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a seperate drive and I physically unplug my windows drive when I'm not using it. when I do, plunplug Linux then plug in windows, hate myself for a while, then revert back.

I refuse to let microslop even see the Linux install since I know they are malicious criminal company and will tamper with shit just because.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

I just kept them on separate drives, but you make a good point that one shouldn't underestimate Microslop's ability to fuck with your shit.

[–] mystik@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I have encountered a windows update that refused to install with a mysterious error code. After searching through the logs, I discovered it was refusing to proceed because it found an installer for an old version of the Netware client (that wasn't installed) that it knew was incompatible, in a non-common directory (C:\PreviousHardDrive\Backups). It was searching the whole hard drive against a database of incompatible programs.

[–] MyNameIsAtticus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Switching to Linux was so helpful. Windows whenever there was an update literally ate up my performance for some reason. 50% RAM just gone (6 GB total). I bet it was just a lack of optimization for less powerful PCs but it was still aggravating

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Windows 10 to 11, or feature updates, are the worst. Sometimes literal hours with adequate RAM, storage space, and NVME drive. It's insane.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Half the time it’s not even doing anything. Minimal CPU and disk usage. They want update to be a background thing, but sometimes I just want it to hurry up and be over with.

MS must be listening to me. I just did todays update and it had my CPUs E cores pegged at 100% usage for a few minutes installing updates.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

To be fair sometimes if you update Linux too sparingly it results in conflicts. Of course the likelihood of that happening depends on the distro. Also the vast majority of Linux updates don’t require a reboot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] alakey@piefed.social 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"I enrolled my laptop into Windows 11 Insiders Program that delivers updates on a more frequent basis, turned it off for half a year and then got mad that I missed a bunch of updates, so I decided to sit there and mash the update button to constantly ping for updates instead of doing literally anything else while it's updating, because I wanted to run tests and had to be fully up-to-date."

Microslop got a lot of issues, but this is fucking ridiculous, the author sounds insufferable.

"But who in the temple is going to sit there for 10 minutes or more while this downloads new updates and reboots?"

Oh, idk, people who don't enroll themselves into a faster paced update cycle.

"And may the gods help you if you buy a brand new PC that's been sitting on a shelf for months or years. You might have hours of updates after you first take it out of the box."

I don't know a single piece of electronic that doesn't require updating after purchasing. Hours, though? Is this guy on a 10kbps connection or where is this fantasy coming from?

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

This has nothing to do with the insider program though. They mentioned it because it makes the situation even worse just because of the large number of updates. I've had the same thing happen to me multiple times on my windows 10 copy that is not enrolled in the insider program.

I don’t know a single piece of electronic that doesn’t require updating after purchasing. Hours, though? Is this guy on a 10kbps connection or where is this fantasy coming from?

No, it's slow regardless of your connection. That's because you're stuck in a loop of:

  1. windows wrongly reporting no updates available so you have to keep clicking on "check for updates" for a few minutes until it shows available updates, and then it only shows a small subset of the actual available updates
  2. the updates downloading and installing unreasonably slowly, sometimes freezing for several minutes with no indication of progress
  3. windows requesting a reboot, refusing to find any more available updates without you doing it
  4. slow reboot because it's installing updates
  5. go to step 1 for several more times

For reference, I've updated arch linux setups after many months of not using them and the process takes ~10 mins at worst, and that's an OS that assumes you update it regularly. You can probably do an entire major release update on debian/ubuntu in the same time that windows takes to install ~6 months of regular updates. It's inexcusable and it's pretty clear that windows doesn't give a shit for anyone that doesn't use it daily, which is exactly the point the article is making.

I'm on Fedora and for me it is as simple as sudo dnf upgrade --refresh -y, Come back in 5 minutes and manually restart.

There is no babysitting required. You can see the realtime progress of the entire process if you want to. It does not need reboots to install other updates. The updates don't refuse to install if you've removed Edge Browser or any other 'necessary' (BS) software.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

My Windows 11 laptop was about an hour of updates when I first got it.

Which is fine, I'm pretty sure I went and made dinner while it was doing that, it's not like you're required to actually do anything for that to happen.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago

Well, to be fair Windows is a paid product and as such one would expect excellent ergonomics, including an if statement checking whether the current system is close enough to the latest update before starting the process without query.

[–] username_1@programming.dev 19 points 1 week ago

You're saying it like Microsoft doesn't punish you for using Windows frequently.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Their update server seems universally throttled. It should somehow selectively throttle, like default to a slow download but if the user is sitting right there and needs to use the damn laptop, allow a button to manually release throttling and download quickly.

I've had nothing but problems with win update. Since I've switched to the win10 alphabet version recently to get extended update support, update seems to fail and require manual download of update packages. It's been a real pain.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

I was helping another team at work a couple of years ago, and during the pandemic shortages they had ordered pallets of computers at a time rather than just ordering as needed like they usually did before and after the shortages. I was tasked with babysitting 5 of those laptops which had been sitting in storage for over a year while they applied updates and whatnot.

I kid you not, babysitting those 5 laptops took the entire business day to get up to date (they for whatever reason did not have any flash drives so I couldn't simply install the latest ISO) and one of the laptops managed to delete all of the keyboard drivers from itself so I had to use the onscreen softkeyboard to attempt to fix it, and ultimately used the manufacturer restore partition to reset it and restart the update process as the cleanest solution

I also got minimal other work done that day as every step of course required some manual intervention on the laptops. I shudder to imagine the scale of lost productivity across the entire world at the hands of Microslop

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use windows like once a year to update some random bios or firmware and it always takes a goddamn long time. I needed to use intel eeupdate to fix wrong checksum on my ghetto cheap intel 10g nic and it took like an hour of update bootloop in my seldom used windows drive. I still have some linux computers using ide drives and its faster to update.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just use a win pe boot environment.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

is there a free way to set that up? I've literally just been moving an internal drive between computers and using a linux live to add it to the boot with efibootmgr if it has one of those early half uefi mobos

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think it’s part of the windows sdk but yeah it’s free.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stewarpt@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Seems a like of people here have never used windows (10) on a hdd

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Working on updates

20 % complete

Please dont turn off your computer.

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Author is kind of a whiny idiot. This doesn't invalidate the issue, but basically everything they do sets themselves up for failure.

They also illustrated that it is getting better - and it is. Windows 7 updates - especially from SP1 - were voodoo science (if you weren't lucky enough to have imaging/etc). Windows 8 was better, 10 even more so, and 11 is just 10 but otherwise awful.

The early days of windows 10 was rough. Every major update they just reinstalled the OS.

Buuut it meant that you could install the latest version, and at worst only have a few more updates before you’re fully updated. Vs like 7 you’d install SP1, then spend 3 hours installing subsequent updates and rebooting.

That said sometimes windows like purposefully throttles installing updates and I just want a button that says “install as fast as fucking possible”. I know it slows down on battery, but plugged in please just go as fast as you possibly can.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Install Linux, Problem Solved.

[–] Tarambor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a torture for seldom used Linux PCs as well. In short any PC that isn't updated for a long period of time is going to spend a long period of time updating with the possibility of breaking things.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I elaborated on another post, I can't replicate this. I manage hundreds of windows PCs and run into this problem from time to time and it's brutal slow to update. Sometimes hours.

My gaming desktop, which hardly gets used because I mainly use a steam deck now, also runs Linux. Maybe 5, 10 minutes at most to patch it.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I boot my Linux desktop to game once in a while. I'll usually patch it and reboot it first. I have fast internet and I'd be blown away if it ever took more than 5 minutes. Windows, however... Holy shit. Some updates or upgrades take hours.

My opinion is that linux's biggest issue is vendor support. Imagine if vendors supported Linux like they do windows. It would be a substantially better OS to use. Imagine adobe and ms office just ran out of the box no problem. Who would want to use windows? It's so bad now.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

over and a while?

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When I enroll a new device at work I have literally one day only to let it run through autopilot (hybrid setup) let all policies (GPO and MDM) trigger and install all the updates (windows and vantage (Lenovo))

Ironically this still an improvement over the HP devices filled to the top with slop…

But imagine giving such a device to a new coworker 😂 as MS intends you to do with autopilot (i set it up with my account and switch the primary after all updates are done)

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This whole thing drives me nuts. I started doing it this way with my own account then switching. But licensing is a pain because then you need to pay to have an admin account manage this. No unlicensed admin can join a device to AAD. And when you license it you have to manually change it with PowerShell. Such a pain in the ass.

Now I just either autopilot or ship to site and tell the user to log in with their email lol. It's slow going but saves a bunch of hassle.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have policy to have an admin account and a normal business premium (with enterprise windows add-on)

So I enroll them to my main 😂 since we have a hybrid setup, I have like 50 dead objects under my account in intunne (hybrid generets a dead object beside the real one during autopilot)

I just switch the primary user in intune

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Ya I've been considering this for some time. Just annoying. Microsoft just wants to nickel and dime us all to death lol

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

back when i still dual-booted windows, one time i hadn’t used it in ~2 months, and the automatic update was so big it kept crashing my shitty wifi

i literally could not use windows with the internet on or else it would crash trying to download the updates…

[–] smeg 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I maintain a small Windows dual boot for taking certification exams (that don't run on Linux). It's torture to update it once every 6 months. 3-4 hours requiring multiple reboots.

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can use Chris titus util to delay the feature updates and keep security updates. That's what I did for my dual-boot

That's what I've done (Use MassGravel for Enterprise version of 11 because fuck it why not for best results?) and haven't had any issues with Windows 11 since. Had to hop back on my Windows SSD for a game that just came out and had one update after a whole year of running strictly Linux!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Programman4233@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

use 'policy plus' and disable windows update

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

use Linux to disable windows

load more comments
view more: next ›