So a court has told another court to stop looking into court cases (and the people not following court orders) and let people not follow court orders.
So court orders are meaningless.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
So a court has told another court to stop looking into court cases (and the people not following court orders) and let people not follow court orders.
So court orders are meaningless.
Not quite. This is a panel decision from two Trump appointees and the respondents have said they will ask the full DC Circuit Court to hear the case. It may be that the initial decision was a lucky draw for Trump and the full circuit will reverse.
Court orders that the regime doesn't like are meaningless.
This three judge panel has been quasi-overruled by the en banc court on this case and issue once before. So it seems reasonable to think that might happen again.
There are still a bunch of hurdles to getting close to any kind of real contempt finding, even if that happens. There's a real argument that the most Boasberg can do with criminal contempt is make a referral to the DOJ for prosecution. And just imagine how much action this DOJ would take on such a referral...
Edit: apparently this is a different three judge panel than the first, but Judge Rao was randomly assigned to both panels.
Hey America, when is the revolution you needed your guns for?
The guns were and are always about signaling threats to the perceived enemies of the perpetually paranoid radical right wing. The idiots waving those things around do not give a flying fuck about the Constitution, America, rights, or freedom.
We all saw what happened when the Black Panther started exercising their rights to open carry. None of this was even remotely a mystery long before donnie dumbfuck rode down that escalator.
Last year, before the continuing consolidation of power.
The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on Lemmy either.
So how does the american court system work? A judge gives an order, but can be overruled if at least to other judges order against it?
So if the judge who gave the first order finds at least three other judges ...
That's the beauty. It works and it doesn't. Just depends on how much you are worth.
God forbid any of these fuckers be held to account for their crimes.
But now, a pair of Trump appointees on the appellate court has decided to fully stamp out Boasberg’s plans, saying in a sharply worded opinion that his contempt probe represented “a clear abuse” of power given that the administration had previously identified then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem as the official responsible for deciding to allow the deportations in question to continue.
Yeah, but, see, Kamala wasn’t a literal Jesus figure so we didn’t vote
The Democrat candidate has to be spick-and-span perfect, didn't you know?
WTF
Maybe next time he jails the people first so they don't violate court orders again.