this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
164 points (98.8% liked)

politics

29463 readers
2238 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lawyers for Donald Trump are engaged in talks with the IRS to resolve a $10 billion lawsuit the president filed against his own tax collection agency over the leak of his tax information to news outlets between 2018 and 2020.

In a federal court filing Friday, Trump asks a judge to pause the case for 90 days while the two sides work to reach a settlement or resolution.

Tax and ethics experts say the lawsuit raises a plethora of legal and ethical questions, including the propriety of the leader of the executive branch pursuing scorched-earth litigation against the very government he oversees.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The talk: "How much taxpayer money should we steal?"

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Take value P, which is how much we can statistically get away with, double it for PP, divide PP by the number of years litigation will take for N, realize that PP isn't 2P It's P^2, so that vaccines PE, now because it's a crime we need to multiply by a negative, but because it's a political person is a much smaller chance of getting caught, so it's the square root of a negative, so i.

So Pe/Ni=$

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago

What a fucking scam

[–] DrPop@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

The person who leaked the data wasn't even an IRS employee, they were a contractor. Go after the company they worked through.

[–] CubitOom 42 points 1 day ago

Trump's lawyers are in talks with the IRS to resolve president's $10B ~~lawsuit~~ theft

[–] artyom@piefed.social 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Some thoughts:

  1. Why is he talking to the IRS about a lawsuit with his tax collection agency? Rhetorical question.
  2. Every other Pres ever has released their tax info publicly and willingly and he's going scorched Earth to crucify the company that leaked it. And America decided this person was fit for President.
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't about resolving anything. It's a made up grievance because he figured out that he can sue the government and then order them to pay him. It's just theft, plain and simple.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 19 hours ago

I did say it was rhetorical

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 59 points 1 day ago

Oh gosh, I wonder however this might get resolved. Surely this president is above paying himself a massive sum from the offices he oversees?

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 30 points 1 day ago

FORTUNATELY we ELIMINATED my VA Benefits and my Child's School Lunches and the Research going into my Wifes LIFE SAVING TREATMENT so we can Afford this Lawsuit!

-Republicans who HATE Corruption!

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So he paid no taxes, right?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 22 hours ago

I think something like $750

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 22 hours ago

I cannot wait until his lips turn blue 🥰