this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
357 points (96.4% liked)

Pizzacake

211 readers
16 users here now

A community to share Pizzacake comics

Do not criticize or praise these comics, in fact please talk about other subjects.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The last death throes of institutionalized fascism.

I hope.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Death throes? What are you talking about? We're in the beginning of Fascism 2.0. Everything we're experiencing is mirroring the rise of Nazi Germany, Japan, and Italy. Except this time it's America, Russia, and China.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Its weird to include China in that list, especially when Japan never de-nazified, and Germany is getting ready to re-nazify.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ask the Tibetans, Uighurs, Hong Kongers, and Taiwanese how they feel.

But maybe don't do the first three, because you're likely putting them in a position between risking their own safety and lying.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Haven't met any Tibetans, but I talk politics with Hong Kongers somewhat regularly, both in and outside China, and Uhigurs both in Xinjiang and Kazakhstan, last time I was there and the time before that. Of course if you think the Chinese government controls Kazakhstan, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Japan, IDK what to tell you.

Last Taiwanese person I met we only talked about green tea, and they seemed really defensive about it so it didn't seem like talking about politics was a good idea.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

it feels more like a cornered animal at this point. and we all know what cornered animals do...

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Maga accidentally joins juche gang lmao

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Djehngo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's wild reading political articles from 2019

Pre COVID, pre-ukraine war, pre Israel/hamas war+genocide+wider middle east war. Everything was so different

[–] kip@piefed.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Horseshoe theory confirmed lol

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So do they support ending the sanctions? Maybe not doing military exercises identical to preparing to invade on NK's border every year during planting and harvesting time?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Its not the first time MAGA fell ass-backwards into accidently supporting a good policy, like when they were calling Trump the peace candidate and opposing needless foreign wars, you know before he murdered hundreds of iranian children and started an unwinnable war.

It would be nice to see them figure out how to support not starving some country for the purpose of weakening them for a future coup or invasion for like 5 minutes until Trump does the opposite of that.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Believing Trump would be a president of peace is just being gullible.

MAGA and the far-left both supporting Russia’s genocide of Ukraine and North Korea’s many human rights violations is just proof that the horseshoe theory is correct.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 13 points 2 weeks ago
[–] isles@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Do you suppose making conditions worse for everyone in NK has been successful in curtailing human rights abuses?

I’m not educated enough in geopolitics to fully answer that question but I do know that North Korea already severely restricts information that flows in and out of the country which makes it hard to know if the sanctions even have an impact on their citizens.

If North Korea allowed them to talk to other people and travel unrestricted and gave them the choice if they wanted to continue that family’s experiment or not I’d have an easier time supporting them.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 weeks ago

Their leader is fat off coke and cheese. He is the one that makes life for them difficult at this point.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you cite exactly what America or any other western country has done specifically, like even just ONE thing, to make conditions worse for everyone in NK? Like I can google the sanctions, they seem pretty targeted at the elite, and over some pretty good reasons.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

If we discount dropping napalm on cities during the war? Or timing military drills to coincide with the harvest and planting seasons to pull farmers away from the fields for self-defence?

I can google the sanctions, they seem pretty targeted at the elite

They ban NK from buying oil, industrial equipment, or selling any of their resources. This is the same play we ran between Iraq pt I and II, after destroying their infrastructure and then restricting them from being allowed to buy the parts to repair it on the international market.

Ostensibly the justification is to cause as much suffering as possible so the people overthrow the government and we can replace it with one who will sell out their people's resources and labor.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Believing that North Korea's working class is starving because of Western sanctions instead of an authoritarian dictatorship is the result of Chinese propaganda.

Like look at the timeline of the sanctions. They're a hell of a lot more recent than the starving.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The sanctions go back to the war, the famine after the war were due to having most of they buildings destroyed and 20% of their population killed. They restarted after the USSR fell and they lost their biggest trading partner, same story with Cuba.

What's the alternative story here, that Kim Jong Un eats all the food? That being "aUtHoRiTaRiAn" means he would rather rule over a starving populace than buy fuel for the tractors?

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 weeks ago

He is fat and always spending cash on stupid parades and American celebrities so…yea not far off to assume he’s that fucking stupid.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, the fan man had nothing to do with multiple failed 5-year plans because implementing a command economy is historically such a successful endeavor.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What the soviets and cpc have accomplished with central planning is undeniably remarkable.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine what Cuba would look like if the Free Market decided who got to eat and receive medicine when there is barely enough food for the population due to the recently intensified blockade.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

They couldn't accomplish it without mass human rights abuses. It's nothing to be proud of and they're certainly not a role model worth emulating.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's a role model worth emulating

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Use your imagination. There's no need to accept disgusting disregard for human life, for any purpose. It makes no sense to act like they did something good. Stop idolizing the human predators of humans.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well we have two competing large economic systems at the moment. I don't really have to use my imagination.

It's weird we only talk about "human rights abuses" when talking about designated bad countries. I'm sure that's just a coincidence.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s weird we only talk about “human rights abuses” when talking about designated bad countries

Is "we" in the room with us right now? I'm me, not we.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We are literally discussing them right now.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No, I don't remember mentioning a specific country. In fact I recall condemning human rights abuses "for any purpose", which means I don't care who does it or why, it's wrong anyway.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They couldn't accomplish it without mass human rights abuses. It's nothing to be proud of and they're certainly not a role model worth emulating.

You said this in response to the point that planned economies in the USSR and China have accomplished quite a lot.

So you said this in particular referring to those two countries.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

And those countries are guilty as described. However, they are not special in this regard. That's why I don't specify.

Edit: Ohhh, I get it. You're a tanky and you're mad because I said something mean about your dictatorship of choice. Lol. Adios.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You didn't say anything except that you agree with the US about the USSR and China.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump probably does support those things. All he does are things that support the West's enemies.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

If Trump's policy towards Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, and North Korea is what support looks like, wtf does opposition look like? Does he give you food, oil, and medicine instead of blockading you?