this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
39 points (95.3% liked)

News

39093 readers
977 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is reportedly nearing the end of its investigation into YouTube’s account suspensions, content removals and platform policies. The probe is examining whether YouTube may have misled users about what content its rules permitted, only for videos to later be removed or accounts suspended. FTC lawyers are reportedly preparing a potential lawsuit against YouTube, although no lawsuit has been filed and the company has not been formally accused of wrongdoing. If the FTC moves forward, this could become a major case for YouTube creators, content moderation, platform transparency, account bans and Big Tech regulation.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

U.S. Supreme Court Allows President to Remove FTC Commissioners

Yeah, I’m sure that this is a totally objective look into YouTube’s black box it calls moderation. I wonder what sort of content that was banned/removed that the FTC is worried about.

Perhaps I am wrong. Perhaps I’m just so jaded that I find it extremely difficult to believe that any part of the current federal government has not been compromised into partisan policing serving the executive.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I'll at least reserve judgement until I see the results. It seems to have started from legit complaints.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The FTC legitimately has no business doing thos. It's a violation of free speech. Although I suppose we can just put it on the pile. It 100% is all about the fascists getting muted. As always they're the biggest crybullies. Perhaps the FTC might have some weight to comment on the content which YouTube chooses to carry but they can fuck right off. If there's bullshit about trying to get rightfully banned and blocked fascist reinstated.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

They’re going at it from a contract violation point of view, which may hold up in court where a free speech argument wouldn’t. They’re looking at what’s stated in the terms of use and community guidelines versus what gets removed or demonetized via moderation.