this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
1157 points (98.3% liked)

Murdered by Words

2540 readers
1105 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Here, I'll give up all means of production that I personally own and aren't for personal use.

Done.

(Ok I'm not giving up my retirement account until we have an effective pension system because I'm not an idiot, but other than that done)

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 7 points 14 hours ago

I’m scared for our society, nobody willing to actually educate themselves outside of social media

[–] ravelin@slrpnk.net 43 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Side note: Google is NOT your friend.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

shoulda said DUCKDUCK

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, that sentence aged like milk

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Capitalism is LITERALLY forcing other people to give away all of their belongings.

In capitalism, you just don't have any remaining belongings to give away.

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Capitalism is LITERALLY forcing other people to give away all of their belongings

can you explain this some? im not very knowledgeable about economic systems

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 25 minutes ago

I'm guessing they mean, that under capitalism, most of your basic needs require money to access, so if you run out of money you have to sell your belongings in order to survive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ask your average blue collar Republican voter what they hate about socialism and they will perfectly describe capitalism

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago

The average socialist describes socialism as a liberal, democratic, capitalist center left government.

People would lose their shit if the government started going after private ownership.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, wait... Jesus Christ literally said that. No, seriously. It was something like, "if you want to follow me, surrender your Earthly possessions" and "A thief cannot rob your ephemeral wealth, unlike stuff in your house." Paraphrased poorly, but that's the gist of it.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

That's what I was thinking. She didn't describe socialism, she described christinism. She probably hates it just the same.

[–] Denfa@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Socialism to a conservative: anything that benefits people I don’t like or don’t care about, with extra scrutiny when it’s POC; Capitalism to a conservative: Dammit I’m special and precious and nothing at all like the other 8 billion souls god saw fit to populate the earth with because I ✓ work ✓ go to church ✓ follow Fox News ✓ am white

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Google's my third biggest enemy.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh! Are the enemies sized in terms of their actual side? Or relative to your hate?

Like, are enemies #1 and #2 the Moon and the Sun or something? Or is #1 a person and your disdain is just larger for them?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

Just by volume. Mass doesn't come into the picture at all.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I mean the proof is in the pudding.

We can all see how the conservative "pull yourself up by your boostraps trickle down" ideology is (isn't) working for the majority of our society, including the vast majority of conservatives.

I'm not some tree hugging ultra-lib. But the bottom line is capitalism simply isn't sustainable. It causes rampant pollution and an ever-widening wealth gap between the haves and have nots. We haven't even been utilizing capitalism that long in the big picture and it's already absolutely catastrophic for our environment. It's just not sustainable. It needs to be HEAVILY regulated if it keeps existing at all. And one thing I know for absolute certain is you get the opposite of regulation when you hire conservatives/regressives.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Well if you hate Hitler's genocide, we shouldn't all have to collectively do something about it. Buy your own gun, get yourself to Germany, and start fighting Nazis yourself!"

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well that is just it, the wealthy of the US were totally on board with the Nazi. Industrialists like Ford help to bankroll the Nazi Empire by building factories and saying they could keep all the profits. Not to mention IBM developing the number system for the tattoos on Jewish prisoners and helping with the logistics of sending them to the death camps

Hitler didn't even want to kill the Jews at first, he wanted to exile them and sent envoys to see if other countries would take them. When the wealthy of the US found out they went and lobbied against this and stroked more anti-jewish sentiment in Europe to ensure the final solution would happen. Hell, even Hitler said he based the Holocaust after the Native American genocide the US committed.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

US was fully onboard with eugenics leading up to WWII. There's a whole lotta retconning going on.

Not the least of it is that US were the heroes in WWII. We were "neutral" until the thing was half through, and even then barely even fought the Germans. History props America up, because one of our biggest exports is "history"...but we're the third-stringers who soaked up the glory when we finished the game 30 points up...while we were brought in with a couple minutes left and up by 50.

Us milennials are the worst of it. We got taught by boomer history teachers who heard endless exaggerated war stories from their dads and uncles and had that to feed their already stubborn attitudes. Or worse, Vietnam vets.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

For real, the US is the source of the fascism which pisses me off when people say the US stopped the fascists. They are the fucking fascist and Italy and Germany were offshoots from the US.

If the US citizens hadn't invested the time and money in the European Axis then perhaps WWII would have never happened. That is speculative, of course, but it really feels the US is responsible especially after walking away from governance in the aftermath of WWI. I digress though.

You are absolutely correct as the Soviet Union did all the heavy lifting taking on around 80 percent of the Nazi forces. It was definitely the undoing of Germany when they attacked Russia, but if they hadn't we may be living in a far worse world for minorities than we have now. Unfortunately, it feels like thanks to the US spreading fascism around the world we are heading there anyways.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That isn't what socialism is, but it is however exactly what Jesus told people to do. And yet she - a Christian - seems to hold the idea in contempt. Curious.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I don't love religion, but many churches do make some attempt to help the poor in the areas where they run.

There are a lot of churches that are closer to a mafia with intent and fees.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

long as you obey

that’s not charity, that’s extortion

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

You don't have to obey, they just make you pay more... to do the right thing... you know, grease god's palms

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 4 points 19 hours ago

Google is a private entity known for problematic practices and associations.

This being said: a decade of underfunded education and propaganda-driven social media bubbles made many people unbelievably sociopathic in their worldview.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

How about you forego social security and Medicare if you hate socialism so much? No? Thats what I thought.

[–] Thor_Whale@lemmus.org 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

But the argument is with that they will say but I paid into it. Which is even stupider because well what about taxes. So there's no argument they just are mad at people because they bought into something and are too bitter what they bought into was bullshit.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I know :/ i just hate hearing all these dumb arguments on the internet lol.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 2 points 16 hours ago

And roads, fire and police services whenever you need those too

[–] DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk 27 points 1 day ago

"Google is your friend."

It might be her friend but it isn't ours!

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 177 points 1 day ago (32 children)

Many people do give some of their money or belongings to those less fortunate already. It's called charity. Socialists want to create a world where charity isn't necessary.

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›