this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
671 points (95.4% liked)

memes

15076 readers
5883 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RQG@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey black mirror had this where they had to watch an ad and looking away was illegal. We're getting there with Google and their recent and announced YouTube and Chrome changes.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Please drink verification can"

[–] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Boy this greentext really ages like fine wine huh

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It really does. This person saw where things were heading way back in 2013 (I think?)

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jokes on them. I can be looking straight at something and still not be paying attention.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Please drink verification can

[–] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

mmmm that really hit the spot

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Now I gotta piss.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know you’ve really made it as a meme when u/the_picard_maneuver posts you on lemmy. Love you bud hope you’re doing well x

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey, is this yours?! I thought it was hilarious.

Also <3

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Haha unfortunately not - I wish I was this funny. First time I saw it, it needed a lot more jpeg so glad to see it’s been renovated. Meme of the month at least imo.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Watching the ad instead of clicking it constitutes a violation of YouTube terms of service.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You wouldn't steal a car, would you?

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

You wouldn't steal a baby.
You wouldn't shoot a policeman, and then steal his helmet.
You wouldn't go to the toilet in his helmet.
And then send it to the policeman's grieving widow...

[–] Enzy@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Yes.

Yes I would.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And here I am, completely ignoring YT and reading blogs, instead.

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I'm more and more moving to podcasts and blogs as well.

[–] logir@feddit.it 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

I mean, it depends. Tutorials, for instance, when I need some info on something to fix, either physically or informatically (e.g., hosting and network stuff). Video format is utterly time expensive for this kind of stuff. I avoid it like the plague. For entertainment, I have a couple of subscriptions a la Netflix. I'm not interested at all in watching/listening "content creators".

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Wait until they require a quiz be taken to prove you watched the video. They could also stitch together the video with the ads, so it's all a single video. They can make fast-forwarding videos impossible (to stop the sponsorblock stuff). Begun the Ad Wars have.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Didn't YouTube literally do this with the question ads a few years ago? That's when I decided I would NEVER be nice to advertisers. They're selling my time for money, not giving me the money, and now they're rude about it. 110% fuuuuuuck them.

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I usually eithe rjust let the timer run out on those or submit bad data

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Same, but the mere demand for attention was enough. Now, if I see an ad, I'll make a script sit there and spend five minutes force-loading their pages to eat their bandwidth right back. They will lose money for every ad I see. Fuck them all.

[–] deur@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just so you know, they already lost money when you clicked on the ad.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I want them to lose a tangible amount. Showing me one ad will cost them the same as showing others hundreds of thousands.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This reminds me of the very real patent that exists for a television that requires you to stand up from your couch, raise your hands in the air, and shout the name of the product you just watched an ad for before it lets you return to watching your program.

[–] Kase@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The day they successfully implement that and I pass by someone actually doing it, I will promptly fall to the ground and die

[–] elvith@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago

Please click verification scam to continue

[–] HW07@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol -2 points 2 years ago

Ok, we made it so YouTube only fetches an enter URL of a video, and when you click on a video, that opens. Only YouTube can give you the actual video link as it is stored and associated in our own database, and you only get it when logged in with Google (so basically you need an account to watch videos but not to see the thumbnails).

Now, we'll only allow Google account sing-ins from a trusted browser or trusted website. This is of course for your security. We will provide you a custom token if you ask to approve a browser, website or an app and we'll take careful looks to see if it violates our policies or not. If we don't detect a valid token provided by your browser, we will display an error message and won't allow you to sing in. Firefox has to also implement this in order to stay relevant (most people need allowing Google logins). The policy bans all things like scam websites, some other things and things against TOSes including YouTube's. Third-party apps blocking ads will be not permitted by YouTube now. We will reject any approve request done by things like Piped and Newpipe.

Have fun with your broken pipe. If they find a fix, we will break it again (:

[–] Haggunenons@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I just found this and I've been loving it, works really well.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Drink verification can?

I'm really happy to see point #2 being mentioned. From their inception, Youtube established a social contract of providing their videos free to users without ads. I don't think Google should just be allowed to unilaterally change the contract on behalf of all parties and force it on everyone. If they had a good reason to do so, perhaps I would humor it, but "because of shithead shareholders" does not pass that bar.

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Excuse me, bitch, but how the fuck you know I went to piss? That's a violation of my privacy.

[–] Fraylor@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Why is THAT the line for your privacy? I'd take them knowing my piss schedule over literally all of the other private information they have access to.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I keep telling you YouTube I have a cloaca and I'm not sure what to call it when I go

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Just wait til it uses the camera on your phone to track your eyes and will pause every time you look away.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

No problem. Just use a proper ad blocker, and there will be no ads that you could use to go to the loo.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Honestly , can't wait for the future where companies like them are allowed to make adless entertainment illegal. It's going to be the absolute best future we could ever ask for. We should be thankful to our overlords for saving us from never having to see ads ever again. /s

[–] scifu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

If technology exists they will 100% implement that ads will keep repeating unless there are people in the room. The active listening devices already record every data they can and it’s only a matter of time before they can accurately conclude if the room is empty or occupied.

[–] Syrus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In less than ten years this will be a "nottheonion" headline...